Fan-works and religion

PopMatters has a long new article today by Dennis P. Quinn, surveying the half-baked fruitcakes who really believe that Lovecraft’s mythos is true.

It’s partly an inevitable side-effect of Lovecraft being a pioneer in the field of participative ‘open’ texts and fan-works. Something that was then turbo-charged thirty years later by the works falling out of copyright, just as a new wave of mass interest crashed down on his life and work. If you open up such a deeply psyche-rooted body of work to those who would create fan-works based on its ideas and themes, then inevitably the results are going to bounce off in a myriad of directions that purists are not going to like; Derleth, Lumley, religious loons and suchlike.

One interesting point made at the end of the article is that…

“Lovecraft’s mythos, in stark contrast to its creator’s own ethnocentric views and overall xenophobia, is a perfect mythology in a multicultural world. Lovecraft’s gods are not bound to any ethnicity, as are the gods of Greece, Rome, Israel, Arabia, Northern Europe, the Americas, Africa, etc. Although they were invented by a New Englander, they are by definition cosmic and out of this world. They are extra-terrestrial, extra-dimensional, and post-race.”

That’s certainly an interesting thought, but I’m coming to the realisation that nearly all his monsters are actually cloaked metaphors for perceived threats of racial invasion, for the societal and personal fear of ‘swamping’ by the alien ‘other’ at the peak of mass immigration into America. Although they are not just this, since they are also tangled up in notions of belief, rationality and the limits of scientific knowledge. Perhaps his monsters still carry a trace of the ‘post-race’ in them, precisely because Lovecraft was not simply projecting them as crude contemporary ‘racial invasion’ metaphors, but was depicting them as reflected in the mirror of his own love/hate relationship with hybridity and the liminal psychological responses surrounding it.

Of course, sometimes his monsters barely had their racist metaphor cloaked. For instance “Shub-Niggurath, The Black Goat of the Woods with a Thousand Young” (apparently inspired by Dunsany’s “Sheol Nugganoth”), for such an accomplished word-smith, cannot have been other than been an invitation to the prejudiced reader to find the phrase “nigger wrath” in the name — accompanied as the name is by the references to “black” and to abundant and promiscuous breeding.

Lovecraft and Sumerian/Babylonian names

The full scanned copy of A Sumero-Babylonian sign list; to which is added an Assyrian sign list, and a catalogue of the numerals, weights and measures used at various periods (1918)…

Variants on Cthulhu, plus Dagon and Shig. Dagon predates the 1918 book, of course, and also appears in Milton and the Bible…

Dagon in Milton — “Dagon his name, sea monster, upward man And downward fish”, Milton, Paradise Lost. Milton had it from the Bible — “the Philistines took the Ark of God and … brought it into the house of Dagon, and set it by Dagon”, Samuel 5.1-7.

Lovecraft and candy

Selections from Lovecraft’s brief tenure as a copywriter for a candy maker

Chocolate Cherry Cordial

You must not think me mad when I tell you what I found below the thin shell of chocolate used to disguise this bonbon’s true face. Yes! Hidden beneath its rich exterior is a hideously moist cherry cordial! What deranged architect could have engineered this non-Euclidean aberration? I dare not speculate.

[ Hat-tip: Brian Keene ]

What if Lovecraft had lived into the 1960s?

Will Hart (cthulhuwho1) celebrates Lovecraft’s 120th Birthday in style by releasing an ultra-rare tape-to-MP3 conversion of a 1978 World Science Fiction panel discussion…

“163 minutes with Professor Dirk W. Mosig, Professor Donald R. Burleson, J. Vernon Shea, Fritz Leiber, Jr., and S.T. Joshi”

The topic is: “What if Lovecraft had lived into the 1960s?”.

From the Deep

Now on at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia in the USA, Creatures of the Abyss (to 6th September 2010). It sounds rather kiddy-oriented and thus likely to be over-run by little monsters and their mothers, but it’s said to have…

“Full-scale models, preserved specimens, exploration vehicles, and a bioluminescence theater”.

… and there are some (presumably) kid-free evening openings.

It’s accompanied at the same venue by the exhibition A Many-Colored Glass: Ethereal Images of Microscopic Marine Life — the catalogue for which is available via print-on-demand at Blurb.


An illustration for At the Mountains of Madness? No, it’s a scientific photomicrograph of some ascorbic acid and liquid crystalline xanthin gum. (Not part of the exhibition).

If you’re in London, England, then the Natural History Museum has the similar major summer exhibition The Deep (to 5th September 2010). Review with photos

Cryptozoology & Science

A new Monster Talk podcast: “Cryptozoology & Science, Part 1“…

“What is cryptozoology? Is it science? Is it folklore? Does it make predictions? In part 1 of a 2-part series, MonsterTalk examines cryptozoology as a field, including speculation on the cryptids most likely to turn out to be real. Guest Dr. Darren Naish, paleontologist and science blogger, makes some surprising statements about the field, its role in science and culture, and the intersection of amateur and professional science.”


Illustration: “Basilisks, Dragonelles and Dragonettes from the Neville Colmore Collection”, part of the Colmore Fatagravures.