• About
  • Directory
  • Free stuff
  • Lovecraft for beginners
  • My Books
  • Open Lovecraft
  • Reviews
  • Travel Posters
  • SALTES

Tentaclii

~ News and scholarship on H.P. Lovecraft (1890–1937)

Tentaclii

Category Archives: Guest posts

Guest post: “Lovecraft, alive in Paris!”

18 Thursday Jul 2019

Posted by asdjfdlkf in Guest posts, Historical context

≈ Leave a comment

Alban, of innsmouthmania.blogspot.com, has kindly sent in a translation of three articles and letters he published in French between 2013 and in 2015. These appeared in his “former blog dedicated to Innsmouth”. They’re published here at Tentaclii as a Guest Post, with my tidying of his translation and factual expansion of a couple of footnotes.



Lovecraft, alive in Paris! An American re-discovery?

In 1970 a young American student from Providence, Paul R. Michaud, travelled to Europe. On walking the streets of the French capital city of Paris Michaud was amazed to discover that a totally unknown American writer of the 1930s, a writer from Michaud’s own hometown no less, was on display in every bookshop. Moreover, this unknown ‘Mr. Lovecraft’ was enjoying an unprecedented posthumous success among the French. Michaud swiftly sent an article to his home town newspaper, the Providence Evening Bulletin, and this duly appeared there on 29th December 1970 under the title of: “In Paris, Lovecraft lives”. What follows is his text:—


“Paris —— Howard Phillips Lovecraft’s strangely accurate description of the sounds and smells of a little-known Paris street prompted a friend to ask him if he had ever been to France. “Yes,” Lovecraft replied, “in a dream with Poe. (1) Except for a few trips to Boston and a trip to the deep south, H.P. Lovecraft never left his home [the last address of which was] on College Hill, Providence. He was a loner who refused contact with the outside world. (2) Despite never having been to Paris, Lovecraft [has now] found a home in the French capital that had long been denied him in Rhode Island and the rest of the United States. Although considered dead to most of his compatriots, Lovecraft is alive and well and lives in Paris.

He is so alive in Paris that it is difficult to walk down the street without seeing his name either in a bookstore window or on a movie [house] front[age]. Just mention to a French student that you are from Providence and most often the name Lovecraft is automatically mentioned — often causing embarrassment to many Rhode Islander who have never heard of him.

Lovecraft is particularly revered by French students, many of whom carry his works in their pockets. For them, Lovecraft is as much a cultural hero as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre were in the past. Lovecraft’s translated works are in such high demand in Paris that most bookstores hold large stocks of several titles. Many of them even go so far as to devote entire showcases to them.

Roger Corman’s The Curse of Arkham, a film adaptation of a Lovecraft story, was so popular in the Latin Quarter that it ran continuously in at least two theatres for several months. One of the cinemas dedicated an entire outdoor display wall to Lovecraft.

Lovecraft’s first French translation appeared in 1954 and, in the following two years, most of his work was published. Since then, Lovecraft’s works have seen several editions and already more than 300,000 pocket[-book] copies have been sold in Paris alone.

Jacques Bergier, the man who spent 20 years trying to get Lovecraft published in French, is the kind of person H.P. Lovecraft would have become if he were still alive today. He is one of the most widely read science fiction authors in France, and recently published Le Matin des Magiciens [Morning of the Magicians, 1960] which has been sold in large print runs in its French and American editions, and is editor of the science fiction magazine Planète (*), he devoted his summer issue to a study of Ho Chi Minh, one of Bergier’s heroes. (3)

A chemical engineer by profession, Bergier has a long list of important discoveries to his credit, as well as the notoriety of having planned the destruction of the German missile base at Peenemünde as a Resistance fighter during the Second World War (4). Today, he is considering accepting an appointment at the University of California at Berkeley, as he plans to move to the United States in the near future.

If Lovecraft was so well received by the French, Bergier points out, it is because he was a writer who protested against the absurdity of a scientific civilization that was rapidly encroaching on man. Since 1940, the French have fought continuously, losing military battles on their own soil and abroad. While Lovecraft’s message was significant to them, it was only very recently accepted by his own country because Americans as a whole realized the absurdity of technology wars only in the mid-1960s, with the increase in American engagement in Vietnam. If Lovecraft’s condemnation of scientific civilization was well received by the French students known to Bergier it is because, like them, he is a “contender”, one who contests or questions the very basis of the society in which he lives. (5)

That Lovecraft is as popular as he is in Paris is very surprising, says Bergier, especially since the American author died more than 30 years ago. Lovecraft sold very well in Paris, despite not being there to promote his books. But, says Bergier, if Lovecraft were alive today, he would probably have avoided any contact with his reading public. This author from Rhode Island was a very shy man, and but for a small circle of friends he was very contemptuous of the human race. If Lovecraft acted in this way, says Bergier, it is because, as a child, he was repeatedly verbally castigated by his mother who told him that he was very mediocre and would never succeed at anything (6). The prediction proved true in Lovecraft’s daily life, as he was never able to earn more than $15 a week from his science fiction writings (7).

Arkham House has published a large number of works by Lovecraft, but in very limited editions. A recent spot-check of the Providence and Boston bookstores led me to find only two copies of Lovecraft’s paperback books — curiously in Fremont Street at a pawn shop. I didn’t find any in Providence. Because Lovecraft had no contact with the outside world, he wrote as if he had lived on another planet, says Bergier. One Lovecraft translation was quite rightly entitled: “Je suis d’ailleurs” (I Come from Elsewhere) (8).

But over the past thirty years, parts of this world that once exiled Lovecraft have begun to resemble very closely the world he wrote about. Little understood during his life as well as in his own country, Lovecraft, like many writers of his decade, became an expatriate, but an expatriate who never had to leave his hometown and country.


Note on the text: Once he returned home to the USA, the excited Paul R. Michaud sought the financial help of his parents to found a small publishing house in 1977. This was the Necronomicon Press, which he then passed on to his younger brother Marc R. Michaud. The aim was to publish works by Lovecraft, but also to discuss matters around and about his work, through publications such as Lovecraft Studies and Crypt of Cthulhu, and to provide a place where people like Will Murray, Kenneth Faig Jr., S.T. Joshi, Robert M. Price, and many others, who through their actions, would finally bring the prodigal child of Providence back home.

FOOTNOTES:

Italics = my additions.

(1) A beautiful but false story that Bergier liked to tell, because it was invented by him. Lovecraft did however, receive copious descriptive letters from Galpin during his time as a student in Paris, and also talked for hours in New York with Galpin’s French wife when she was ‘fresh off the boat’ from Paris.

(*) Planète ran 1961 to 1972. To call it a science-fiction magazine (in the British/American 1960s/70s sense) is somewhat misleading. It sometimes ran fiction by Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Ray Bradbury, and Asimov gave it a good interview in 1965. But by 1970 it seems it mainly… “explored esoteric ideas. Bergier was interested in the possibilities of extraterrestrial life and explored reported sightings of UFOs.” Evidently it was also an occasional organ of doctrinaire Marxist-Leninist communism in 1970.

The current Simon & Schuster blurb for the book Morning of the Magicians calls it… “The first book to explore in depth the Nazi fascination with the occult, Pauwels and Bergier also broke new ground with their study of pyramidology, alchemy and its close kinship with atomic energy, and the possibility of a widespread mutation of humanity that would herald the dawn of a new age for the earth.”

(2) False, except for a period when a young man. HPL as we now know, without being an actual ‘backpacking hiker’, took to travelling extensively during his adult years. Although even this was usually seasonal — a reclusive winter hermitage, then a sallying forth on travels during the late spring and through the summer.

(3) Paris had been deeply rattled by the failed revolutionary student uprisings of May 1968, while America was in the middle of the Vietnam War which was likewise rattling the nation’s sense of itself. Paris in 1970 was still in extreme political ferment, and the ideas of its intellectual salons and pamphlets were inspiring those who would soon unleash waves of armed leftist terrorism in Europe throughout the 1970s. “Ho Chi Minh” was one the many names of the Vietnamese Communist leader, a man responsible for spreading communist regimes across Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Minh was ultimately responsible for the deaths of around 4 million people, and the long misery of many subsequent generations in that region.

(4) He was part of the underground ‘Marco Polo network’ which warned London that the Nazis had carried out successful tests with long-range cross-Channel ‘V’ attack rockets. These messages, addressed to Colonel Remy, caught the attention of the British command — which took the threat into consideration and successfully launched an action to sabotage the base.

(5) In the swirl of post-’68 leftist politics in Paris, HPL was evidently deemed a fellow Marxist-Leninist and protestor! But there we feel that Bergier is speaking, and also suspect that Michaud, as an American, later became aware that HPL would surely have approved of the anti-communist aims of the Vietnam War.

(6) Psychoanalytical theory, such as it was in 1970, was commonly hazily understood among leftist intellectual circles to be ‘parent-blaming’, and this fitted well with the generational politics of the period. As for HPL, we now know that the facts of his misanthropy and his relationship with his mother was a little subtler than that.

(7) “Writings of weird fantasy” would have been more appropriate, but at that point in time few in America would have remembered what “the weird” once was.

(8) In fact: “The Outsider”, in the original title.


Paul Michaud, who actually lives in France, has written to us to give us more information:

“What you discovered, and ‘resurrected’ is only a small part of the original story [of ‘the news from France’ in 1970], acquired first by Jann Wenner of Rolling Stone magazine and later by the New York Times book reviewer — who lost the negatives I had sent them — and who ultimately did not publish it. Later it was August Derleth who, if I remember correctly, used some photos that I had the good idea to have printed before sending the negatives.

What was published in the Evening Bulletin is only a pale reflection of my original article, which contained, among other things, a larger part of the interview I had obtained from Jacques Bergier, who spent hours with me in his office on the Champs-Elysées during the month of August 1970.

Moreover there was a point years later, when Louis Pauwels (Bergier’s literary executor) also became a friend, and when he handed over Bergier’s archives to the Saint-Germain-en-Laye public library… then I noticed that the envelope marked by Bergier as containing his “correspondence with Lovecraft”, was… Empty! As for “completing” the version of my story, there was then no technical way to memorize or copy his writings, apart from using carbon paper on a typewriter, which unfortunately I did not do at the time.

I don’t remember the original [typescript] very well, the one that was typed for the Evening Bulletin. I had been their correspondent when I was in high school, alongside such luminaries as novelist Lesley Horwitz, or actor James Wood, and I knew they would take everything I had been unable to sell in the big newspaper markets. It is possible that my brother Marc Michaud, who took over the torch from Necronomicon Press in the late 1970s, has these good things to print in his archives, but given his constant travel, floods and other disasters, which he has faced in recent years, I doubt that he knows where the original article and my notes are located.

Moreover, my only contact with Lovecraft — until my first visit to Paris in 1970 — was through Ted Klein, whom I succeeded in 1969 as editor-in-chief of the Brown Daily Herald, the student newspaper of Brown University (Providence), and who had written a magnificent Lovecraftian piece titled “The Events at Poroth Farm” which Necromicon Press later reprinted, and which appeared at the time in one of Fantasy’s annual collections of ‘best writing’.

Ted during his last years in Brown lived with nine roommates in an apartment on Thomas Street, Providence, in the place which is featured prominently in an HPL tale (“The Call of Cthulhu”). It was also thanks to Ted that I was able to meet a very young writer who was also very influenced by Lovecraft, and not yet published at the time: Stephen King. He and Ted, conscientious objectors [to ‘the draft’ for the Vietnam war], taught English together in a school in Maine, in order to avoid being sent to Vietnam – an opportunity for them.


A further note, on Paul Michaud, HPL and Houellebecq in Biarritz.

In August 1979, Paul Michaud gave a lecture in Biarritz [expensive resort in the south of France] on Lovecraft in front of an audience of retirees, who had fallen soundly asleep under the overwhelming heat of the season. They woke only when he showed his slideshow of Weird Tales covers – those concerning the first publications of HPL – in which delicious nearly-bare pin-up girls fight against gelatinous or bestial semi-human monsters.

At the end of the presentation, a young man introduces himself. He says he is fascinated by the presentation, and asks for some references by which he might learn more about Lovecraft. As a gift, he offers the number [issue?] of the Que Sais-je collection on the ancient Gnostics, whose reading he had just completed. He tells the speaker that he is studying agricultural engineering and gives his address in Paris, near the Place de l’Odéon, not far from where Paul Michaud also lives — and finally gives his name: Michel Thomas.

It was only several years after this event Paul realized that this young man, passionate about Gnostics and Lovecraft, was none other than Michel Houellebecq and that undoubtedly, without really having sought it, Paul had helped him a little bit to “launch” his later literary career. Since in 1991 Houellebecq became the author of one of the first critical books in France on HPL.


Original Web links and some related pictures can be found here :

http://innsmouthmania.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-paris-lovecraft-vit.html

http://innsmouthmania.blogspot.com/2014/10/a-paris-lovecraft-vit-une-redecouverte.html

http://innsmouthmania.blogspot.com/2015/01/paul-michaud-hpl-et-houellebecq-sont.html

Guest post: “John Edwards of the Ladd Observatory at Brown – Cockney or Cornishman?”

31 Friday May 2019

Posted by asdjfdlkf in Astronomy, Guest posts, Historical context, Scholarly works

≈ 1 Comment

Horace Smith had kindly posted the following as a comment on this blog. But I think I’d rather present it as a Guest post, which does his work justice. So, here is his investigation…


John Edwards of the Ladd Observatory at Brown — Cockney or Cornishman?

By Horace Smith.

I’ve been researching H.P. Lovecraft’s early astronomical interests. Tentaclii had at one point briefly puzzled over Lovecraft’s calling the Ladd Observatory assistant, John Edwards, a Cockney in one letter and a Cornishman in another. If what I have found is right, he was neither by birth.

Picture: the Ladd Observatory as it appeared in the mid to late 1930s. Newly shadow-lifted and colourised.

Of the three staff members of the Ladd Observatory, whom Lovecraft “pestered half-to-death” in his youth, the observatory assistant John Edwards provided the greatest practical aid to Lovecraft’s astronomical endeavours. Whether it was offering a diagonal eyepiece for his telescope, lantern slides for a lecture, or a lens for a camera, Edwards was there to help. But, aside from being an assistant at the Ladd Observatory, who was John Edwards? In different letters, Lovecraft alternatively referred to him as a cockney, a term traditionally applied to someone from East London, and a Cornishman from Cornwall. Could I pin down which, if either, was correct?

Tracing genealogical connections can be tricky, and not everything you read online can be trusted. I knew when I began only that Edwards had worked at the Ladd Observatory in the late 1890s and early 1900s, but I didn’t know his middle name, nor when he was born, nor where, except that England was a good bet for his birthplace. I turned to Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org to progress further.

The federal census for 1910 gave me a middle initial, W, and a spouse, Mary A. It also provided a birth date of around 1858 and an immigration date of 1887. In 1915, Edwards accepted his former colleague Frederick Slocum’s offer of a position at Wesleyan University’s new Van Vleck Observatory in Middletown, Connecticut. When Edwards took up that position, the Wesleyan University Bulletin printed his full name: John William Edwards. Alas, his stay at Wesleyan was not long, for he died of heart disease three years later, on 24th April 1918.

Picture: Wesleyan University Bulletin for May 1918.

The Hartford Courant newspaper for 28th April 1918, informed me that, after Edwards’s death, his body was taken to Attleboro, Massachusetts, for burial. Why Attleboro?

‘Find a Grave’ led me to a photograph of the tombstone of John and Mary in Attleboro. It carried their birth and death years (1858-1918 for John and 1856-1917 for Mary) and those of two of their children, Joseph (1882-1901) and May (1891-1891). The 1910 census had already told me that, by 1910, two of their three children had died, and the gravestone and census were thus consistent. The son still living in 1910 was Alban Edwards, born in Lonsdale, Rhode Island, in 1888. His First World War draft card showed that it was he who resided in Attleboro. Massachusetts death records confirmed that Mary Ann Edwards had died in North Attleboro in 1917, the year before her husband’s passing. Now the burial of John and his wife in Attleboro made sense. The gravestone also gave me Robinson as Mary’s maiden name.

With that information, could I trace the family back to England? I checked immigration records, finding one likely match: the arrival from Liverpool of a John Edwards with Mary A. Edwards and Joseph Edwards, all of the right ages, at the port of Boston aboard the Catalonia on the 1st of October 1887. They were lower steerage passengers, and John was labelled a labourer. I next came up with a marriage record for a John Edwards and a Mary Ann Robinson on 12th April 1879, at Christ Church in Preston, Lancashire, with the birth years of 1858 for John and 1857 for Mary. That seemed quite close and, if correct, gave me Peter Edwards as John’s father and an association with Lancashire. Was there additional evidence for a Lancashire connection? A John William Edwards was christened on 4th April 1858, at Saint John Church in Preston, Lancashire. John William Edwards was also listed as having been born in Preston sometime in the first quarter of 1858. If not a certainty, there is at least some likelihood that he was the future assistant at the Ladd Observatory.

Everything was hanging together, so far. But John Edwards is a common name. Could I find any evidence that contradicted the above? I did find one document that didn’t fit. The 1900 U.S. Census showed a John Edwards who was an astronomer’s assistant, who lived on Doyle Avenue, near the Ladd Observatory, who was the right age, and who arrived in the United States 12 years earlier in 1888 — not far off the late 1887 date found above. The census’s March, 1858, birth date is consistent with an early April christening. However, the 1900 census stated that John was single! Where were Mary and Alban? Was that just a mistake? Or did it indicate some sort of otherwise hidden family problem?

I checked the 1900 census for a Mary A. Edwards. Mary Edwards is a common name, but I couldn’t find a Mary Edwards that seemed to fit the bill in terms of age, birthplace, spouse, etc. Nor was there any mention of an Alban Edwards. To try to straighten things out, I turned to the Providence city directories. The 1901 and 1903 directories showed John living at two different Doyle Avenue addresses. They also showed that a Mrs. Mary A Edwards worked as a nurse and lived at 67 Manton Avenue in Providence, but later directories show that she was not the Mary Edwards for whom I was looking. Many women who were not heads of a household or employees do not appear to be listed within the directories, so the absence of Mary is not necessarily telling. For example, John W. Edward’s address in the 1910 city directory is consistent with his 1910 census address, However, the 1910 directory makes no mention of Mary, while the 1910 census indicates she was living with John at that address.

Fortunately, Rhode Island carried out state censuses in between the federal ones. I discovered a 1905 Rhode Island state census for a John W. Edwards, living on Doyle Avenue, of the right age — his birth date is given as 4th March 1858 — and working at the Ladd Observatory, with a mother and father born in England. Those last items are incorrectly indexed on the transcribed version of the census, but are clear in the original. However, in that census, Edwards is listed as married not single, with four in the household. There is also a census entry for Mary A. Edwards at the same address — her birth date is indexed as 18th April, 1856, but the original pencilled entry is hard to read. Mary was then a mother of three, only one of whom was still living, and with a household again containing four people.

My conclusion is that the weight of the evidence indicates that it is the 1900 census entry which is in error. Perhaps the circumstance of their son Joseph having died the following year somehow temporarily disrupted living arrangements? Or perhaps “the census-taker’s knock” awakened John after a night of observing and he just wanted to get back to bed as quickly as possible! If all this is indeed correct, we conclude that John Edwards was English, but neither a cockney nor a Cornishman.



 

Please become my patron at www.patreon.com/davehaden to help this blog survive and thrive.

Or donate via PayPal — any amount is welcome! Donations total at Summer 2022, since 2015: $340.

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010

Categories

  • 3D (13)
  • Astronomy (57)
  • Censorship (13)
  • de Camp (6)
  • Doyle (7)
  • Films & trailers (88)
  • Fonts (8)
  • Guest posts (2)
  • Historical context (1,068)
  • Housekeeping (83)
  • Kipling (10)
  • Kittee Tuesday (74)
  • Lovecraft as character (38)
  • Lovecraftian arts (1,382)
  • Lovecraftian places (19)
  • Maps (58)
  • NecronomiCon 2013 (40)
  • NecronomiCon 2015 (22)
  • New books (864)
  • New discoveries (158)
  • Night in Providence (17)
  • Odd scratchings (851)
  • Picture postals (208)
  • Podcasts etc. (375)
  • REH (148)
  • Scholarly works (1,234)
  • Summer School (31)
  • Uncategorized (2)
  • Unnamable (85)

Get this blog in your newsreader:
 
RSS Feed — Posts
RSS Feed — Comments

H.P. Lovecraft's Poster Collection - 17 retro travel posters for $18. Print ready, and available to buy — the proceeds help to support the work of Tentaclii.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.