Major new Roosevelt documentary

A new seven part Ken Burns documentary series on Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt. Perhaps relevant to those seeking to understand the context for Lovecraft’s post-1935 turn away from “fascistic socialism”, toward broadly supporting FDR in the later New Deal period (albeit via his own idiosyncratic ‘aristocratic’ misunderstanding of the New Deal)…

“No monk in his cell was ever more withdrawn from the excitements and occupations of ordinary life than that beaked and bony dreamer, sitting in his aerie on “The Ancient Hill”. Yet such was the scope of his intellectual curiosity that he even developed an academic interest in government and a singularly romantic conception of the New Deal, gorgeously complicated with Utopian ideologies that would have astonished even Mr. Roosevelt. Who, in Lovecraft’s opinion, was about to produce an authentic Millennium out of his presidential hat. The embroideries contributed by Lovecraft included adequate provisions for indigent gentlemen and scholars, baronial largesse for the peasantry, liberal endowments for those desiring to practise the arts and sciences, a stiff educational test for voters, and the gradual substitution of an aristocracy of intellect for the present aristocracy of wealth.” (E.A. Edkins)

While Benefit street was young (1943)

A very nicely designed and illustrated 1943 booklet, While Benefit street was young by Margaret Bingham Stillwell (1887-1984). A short but vivid first-hand childhood account of a street and area that Lovecraft knew well, around the turn of the century. Written by an academic who was, back then, a slightly older youth than Lovecraft was (circa age 14-ish, to his 11-ish?). Sadly there’s no Kindle or OCR version, but it can be freely read online at HathiTrust.

benefit

Encyclopedia Brunoniana states that the booklet was…

intended to defend the street of her childhood from a reputation of sordidness and disrepair suggested by David DeJong’s [David Cornel De Jong] novel, Benefit Street. … She continued her campaign with the publication in 1945 of The Pageant of Benefit Street [144 pages, sadly not online].

North and South Britons

Lovecraft on the vexed question of Scottish independence, on which the Scots vote next week.

“North and South Britons” was published under the pen name “Alexander Ferguson Blair” in The Tryout, May 1919. Presumably his poem was written in response to the increasing likelihood of Irish independence following the end of the First World War, and a consequent fear that the Scots would also ask for independence.


North and South Britons

Man is so much with prejudice imbu’d,
That love and hate arise from latitude;
What else can cause such petty strife to breed
Along the Cheviots and flowing Tweed?
No sober sense could disagreement bring
‘Twixt Britons with one country and one King.
Beyond the seas, the Colonies are built
Alike by men of breeches and of kilt;
On fields of war, with blood of heroes dy’d,
Stand sturdy Scots and Saxons side by side:
In harmony the martial music comes
From Scottish bagpipes and from English drums;
Amid such scenes none stops to boast his birth
As being north or south of Solway Firth;
There Fife and Devon, Ayr and Dorset blend,
And all for one united land contend.
How strange that men, so brotherly abroad,
Cannot be brothers on their native sod!
Would that each Scot and Saxon might be free
From local feuds, and childish jealousy.
Who shall the one above the other place,
When both are mix’d in one imperial race?
Rule on, belov’d Britannia, rule the waves—
No Britons, North or South, shall e’er be slaves!

Added to Open Lovecraft

* Alexander A. G. Gladwin, Matt Lavin, and Daniel M. Look (2014), “[Who?]—can—write—no—more”: Stylometry, Authorship, and “The Loved Dead” (Pre-print, accepted for Literary and Linguistic Computing. Applies modern stylometrics to Lovecraft and Eddy’s story “The Loved Dead”, which Eddy claimed had caused Weird Tales to be “banned in Indiana” and perhaps elsewhere. The team’s results are inconclusive, but the investigation is prefaced by a good summary of the history of the story.)

Houdini bio-pic

Major new four-hour U.S. Houdini bio-pic, airing on British TV tonight. It would be interesting if Lovecraft & Eddy were to make an appearance as his anti-spiritualist assistants. Apparently there is a substantial treatment of Houdini’s dogged attempts to combat the evil of spiritualism — a morbid and deceiving cult which preys on and feeds off those in mourning for a loved one. So I guess there’s a chance for a Lovecraft character…

The magician’s late crusade to expose psychics and mediums, which alienated him from his friend Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (David Calder), a devout spiritualist, slows the biopic to a crawl.

Sadly the advance reviews from America are dire (“unwatchable”, “pure biopic cheese”, “leaden script”, “boilerplate”, “biopic clichés, awkwardly strung together”), so be warned. Download, and then skip through, seems to be the likely best option for saving yourself a few hours of tedium.

houdin

A certain audacity

The Brodsky frontispieces in the 1919 collection of Baudelaire that Lovecraft owned, and from which he took the opening quote which heads the story “Hypnos” (1922)…

   “Apropos of sleep, that sinister adventure of all our nights, we may say that men go to bed daily with an audacity that would be incomprehensible if we did not know that it is the result of ignorance of the danger.” — Baudelaire.

BaudelaireBrodzky1919-hypnos

Added to Open Lovecraft

* W.R. van Leeuwen (2008), Dreamers of the Dark: Kerry Bolton and the Order of the Left Hand Path, a case-study of a Satanic neo-Nazi society (Masters dissertation for The University of Waikato. Has nothing to say on Bolton’s fascination with Lovecraft’s various elitist philosophical stances and the racialist worldview he shared with his milieu. But van Leeuwen does allege, in passing, that Bolton was both the publisher and author of Walter Grimwald’s 1995 pamphlet Lovecraft’s Fascism. It’s only fair to add that Bolton has responded that “Van Leeuwen’s thesis is a tissue of pure (and impure) inventions”.)