I see that the new graphic novel He Who Wrote in The Darkness, which I reviewed here in English a few days ago, is now available in Spanish translation.
El Escritor de las Tinieblas
29 Saturday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books
29 Saturday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books
I see that the new graphic novel He Who Wrote in The Darkness, which I reviewed here in English a few days ago, is now available in Spanish translation.
28 Friday Dec 2018
Posted in New books
A new Italian review has further details of the new Italian book L’orrore di Lovecraft, which I noticed in a post some weeks ago but couldn’t quite figure out to what extent it might be an artbook. Although richly produced and illustrated, it’s actually more of an anthology.
It has 40 Mythos stories by various writers, and the review makes these sound like standard-fare. But the book also has four essays, plus a new Italian translation of Lovecraft’s “The Tomb”. A Deluxe colour two-volume edition also has a new Italian translation of “The Dunwich Horror” by “Professor Busnelli Miriam”. The essays, apparently left unread by the reviewer, are in translated-title:
“The ‘reverse’ positivism of H.P. Lovecraft” / “Il positivismo ‘inverso’ di H.P. Lovecraft”, by Stefano Spataro.
“Lovecraft and the in-communicability of materialism” / “Lovecraft e l’incomunicabilita del materialismo” by Giacomo De Colle.
“The” Weird Music Of H.P. Lovecraft” / “The “Weird” Music Of H.P. Lovecraft” by Cesare Buttaboni. [possibly in English?]
“Lovecraft: a journey into the unknowable” | Lovecraft: un viaggio nell’inconoscibile” by Daniela Ferraro Pozzer.
The Deluxe edition is a large-format colour version for collectors in two volumes, presumably so that the art can be fully enjoyed.
27 Thursday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books
H.P. Lovecraft: He Who Wrote in the Darkness is a substantial new graphic novel by writer Alex Nikolavitch and the Argentinian artist Gervasio.
A highly compressed low-res PDF preview edition was kindly provided for review by the publisher, Pegasus Books of New York. The body of the book runs to 98 pages of art, rising to 112 pages when counting the introduction by screenwriter David Camus, chapter dividers, a page of biographical endnotes on Lovecraft’s circle, and some cross-promotional padding. The book is available in print and as an ebook download via Amazon. While the book is currently rather expensive in the UK at £19 in print and £18 in ebook, I see that used print copies are starting to become available here at lower prices. I also see that the price of the print edition has dropped by $10 in the USA, since its Halloween 2018 publication.
The two-page introduction is by screenwriter David Camus and appears to have been translated from his native French. This is informed and perceptive, with Camus making interesting and very relevant points about Lovecraft’s delight in playing roles (the Old Gent, the Dandy, the Hermit, the Prankster, the Mentor, the Cynic and so on) and about the often-overlooked humour and subtle self-parody that can bubble up in Lovecraft’s work.
Gervasio’s art is not the slickest ever seen, but is a delight throughout. He frames his panels expertly, the panels flow a complex story over the page with ease, and within these panels his precise facial expressions speak volumes. For instance an especially memorable expression from Samuel Loveman. He has just passed Sonia on the stairs as she leaves Lovecraft for good, and Loveman is ascending toward Lovecraft.
This one panel shows how much there is for an informed reader to bring to this graphic novel, if one knows Lovecraft’s life and friends well. Yet it also shows the depths of meaning that the casual uninformed reader will totally miss. It’s a credit to the two creatives at work here that the book usually manages to walk the tightrope between the two types of reader.
Gervasio’s attention to period detail and clothing is excellent, and he doesn’t stint on this. His panels are filled with all sorts of charmingly authentic items, and yet they hardly ever feel cramped. One even wonders if he might be putting his own knowledge of Lovecraft’s life into the panels. For instance, in the first panel we see Lovecraft walking into the seedy Red Hook in search of cheap solo lodgings. Behind him a plump older man is about to be run down by a truck. Possibly Gervasio has no idea that Lovecraft’s good anarchist friend Morton was killed by a collision with a vehicle in 1941, but it’s a poignant little detail to open with. Having a cat watch Lovecraft is also a nice touch, but again it’s only something that will have meaning for those who know Lovecraft’s life.
There are many such details to be found as one reads on. I should also note that Gervasio’s art has also been expertly coloured in a ‘very slightly faded’ way and with obvious reference to typical “1930s urban America” colour palettes. Unfortunately we don’t get a Marvel-style credits box which breaks down exactly who-did-what, so I’m uncertain exactly who the colour flatting was done by. But it doesn’t seem to have been Gervasio himself. In terms of the details of the visual characterisations, Gervasio accurately portrays the various members of the Lovecraft circle. Yet he obviously had no access to the good photograph I found of Henry Everett McNeil (see my recent book on McNeil, Good Old Mac) which revealed McNeil to the world for the first time since the 1920s. Thus, while McNeil is accurately portrayed here as an ‘oldster’, he is far too angular and crew-cut in appearance. Also, Sonia is perhaps not as voluptuous and well-fed as she really was, as here she is more angular in appearance.
The script by Alex Nikolavitch is neatly structured, covering Lovecraft’s life from 1925 to 1937 in chronological order while dipping occasionally into flashback memories and short evocations of the stories. This wide variety of settings retains interest, but often shuttles the reader about at a hectic pace. Nikolavitch necessarily condenses, highlights and omits, for dramatic purposes. For instance, we see only Mrs Miniter and no Mrs Beebe on the fateful visit to rural Wilbraham that birthed “The Dunwich Horror”. Nor do we see the many cats and curious ‘cat-ladders’ of the property. But this won’t be noticed by non-Lovecraftians. Sometimes emotional overtones are added, such as Lovecraft being rather ‘off-ish’ with a pushy Hoffman Price when they first meet in New Orleans in 1932. Overall, I’d say that Lovecraft is perhaps depicted by Nikolavitch as rather more openly grouchy and grumpy than he really was…
These are not really criticisms, just observations on the quite understandable changes that are inevitably needed when shaping and heightening a serious dramatic work.
But there are some minor criticisms to be made. The most significant point open to negative criticism is the dialogue. Often this is heavily encumbered by the need to explain an Important Biographical Fact to the uninformed reader. This leads to characters “speaking out of character”, often jarringly so. This ‘NPC’ problem is amply demonstrated by the first major splash page, which conveys a plain fact about the 1925 solar eclipse but which falls flat both emotionally and as spectacle.
There also are perhaps a few rather large historical liberties taken, though in some cases I can’t be sure. For instance Houdini is shown as being assassinated by a religious fanatic for his atheism, rather than killed by a jock-ish student who threw an idiotic and probably inebriated punch. Perhaps this actually reflects some new Houdini scholarship but, from my reading on Houdini and Lovecraft, I wasn’t aware of this religious aspect of his death. One recent trustworthy scholar shows it was actually all a mis-direction by Houdini’s conniving widow, who claimed the punch killed him in the hope of cashing in on a ‘double indemnity’ in his insurance policy. But I’m not a Houdini-ist and am not qualified to judge.
There are also a few basic errors that the publishers of an expensive £19 / $26 book should have caught but didn’t, such as Sonia’s line “Does the neighbour inspire you” (page 23) which should have read “neighbourhood”, and a jarring continuity error on the opening panel. In the very first text we read in the book we are told the date is “1st January 1925”, yet we see Brooklyn in high summer with the trees in full leaf… rather than darkly descending into the worst New York winter snowstorm in living memory (1st-3rd January 1925).
Despite my probably overly-picky criticisms, for the general reader this graphic novel will be a fine and informative read. It will introduce many to a basic outline of Lovecraft’s life and friendships, including those who would not venture to read a weightier life of Lovecraft. Such readers will miss a great deal but they will be pleased by the real richness of the art, entertained by the varied settings and the occasional dips into the famous stories, and they will simply not notice the historical omissions and changes.
H.P. Lovecraft: He Who Wrote in the Darkness is thus a welcome addition to a small but growing number of such graphic novels which depict aspects of Lovecraft’s biography, and it will sit companionably on the shelf alongside Une nuit avec Lovecraft (2018) and Some Notes on a Nonentity: The Life of H.P. Lovecraft (2017). Let us hope that these three are just the opening books in what will become a small library of graphic novels that depict the wealth of material to be found in Lovecraft’s endlessly fascinating life and strange interior dimensions.
27 Thursday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books, Odd scratchings, Scholarly works
S. T. Joshi has a new blog post. He notes a new and apparently high-quality literary journal on the macabre, which includes essays…
Vastarien, containing my essay “Richard Gavin: The Nature of Horror” (a chapter of 21st-Century Horror). This superbly produced journal, edited by Jon Padgett and published by Grimscribe Press, is a wonder to behold.
The content-lists make it rather difficult to tell what’s an essay and what’s not. For instance, is Christopher Mountenay’s “Bequeathing the World to Insects” an essay on this post-human notion in imaginative literature (the far-future ‘mighty beetle civilisation’ of Lovecraft, etc), or a story?
The Kindle ebook issues can also be had on Amazon at £3.50 (about $5) each, and there are 10% free samples.
16 Sunday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books
Pre-ordering now, in Italian, the 240-page I Luoghi di Lovecraft (The Places of Lovecraft). A ‘guide to Lovecraft country for new tourists’, apparently written to conform to the style-sheet given to authors of the Lonely Planet guidebook series.
13 Thursday Dec 2018
Posted in Lovecraftian arts, New books, Scholarly works
It appears that scholars and publishers are doing serious work on republishing and writing about Colin Wilson, the British fringe philosopher and novelist (The Space Vampires etc) who played a part in the reception of H.P. Lovecraft. See Colin Wilson World News for full details. Regrettably the site has no RSS feed that I can find.
10 Monday Dec 2018
Posted in New books, Scholarly works
A new Kindle ebook of 239 pages, just published, surveys Italian Sword & Sorcery: La via Italiana all’heroic fantasy. It’s in Italian, and appears to be from independent scholars. Here’s the blurb translated and tweaked…
Francesco La Manno, aided by Annarita Guarnieri, aims to outline the boundaries of sword and sorcery. The lead essay makes an analysis of the core constituent elements of sword and sorcery. It does this firstly by an examination of the main characters of heroic fantasy as crafted by the Master of Cross Plains (Conan, Kull, Solomon Kane, Bran Mak Morn and James Allison); then through a survey of the cycles of Clark Ashton Smith (Hyperborea, Poseidonis, Averoigne and Zothique) and Thongor of Lemuria by Lin Carter; then a look at some recent commercialisations of the genre. Finally, there is a survey of ‘the new heroic Mediterranean fantasy’ and its [bishops = authors and curators?]. The volume also contains essays by Adriano Monti Buzzetti, Gianfranco de Turris, Mario Polia and Paolo Paron.
10 Monday Dec 2018
Posted in Historical context, Lovecraftian arts, New books, REH, Scholarly works
Added to Open Lovecraft…
* Philip Emery, “Revivifying the Ur-text: a reconstruction of sword-&-sorcery as a literary form”, PhD thesis at Loughborough University, UK, 2018. (The author is a North Staffordshire writer, of several horror novels. Here he asks if, given this literary genre’s relative neglect in recent decades, it is possible to identify the genre’s core characteristics and then use these “to create a work that realizes the form’s potential to exist as literature”. Explores the structural development of the Ur-genre as it emerged in the stories of R.E. Howard (influenced by Lovecraft in terms of the horror elements), then surveys de Camp’s later contributions and distortions, and generally seeks to identify the “pristine elements” at the core of the genre’s once-flourishing form which are still available to creative writers).
07 Friday Dec 2018
Posted in New books, Scholarly works
“Edward Gorey: master of the macabre” The Spectator Australia reviews the new book Born to Be Posthumous: The Eccentric Life and Mysterious Genius of Edward Gorey. The reviewer echoes the complaint of one of the Amazon reviewers when he says that “There’s a great deal of repetition in this book”, but finds it assiduously thorough.
Perhaps that opens an opportunity for someone to make a heavily abridged graphic novel, or a heavily illustrated abridged version, at some point?
04 Tuesday Dec 2018
Posted in New books, Scholarly works
The new book Holy Monsters, Sacred Grotesques: Monstrosity and Religion in Europe and the United States is one of those elite $115 essay collections seemingly aimed at collecting dust in University and (in this case) ecclesiastical libraries.
I’ve only just noticed it, and see that it appeared in the summer of 2018. It’s only of interest here for the one chapter: “Lovecraft’s Things: Sinister Souvenirs from Other Worlds” by Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock. Curiously an essay of the same title, and by the same author, also appeared in the similar (though now rather less costly) book collection The Age of Lovecraft (2016), so the 2018 essay seems to be a reprint — though I suppose it could also be revised and/or expanded version.
For those wondering what’s in that essay, since the new book has no previews as yet… after introductory and theoretical ‘thing theory’ sections, the final third of Weinstock’s Age of Lovecraft essay surveyed Lovecraft’s re-use of the stock Gothic props of the Castle (“Rats”), the Portrait (“Pickman”), and the Forbidden Book (guess), especially in terms of their uncanny quasi-personification in Lovecraft’s texts. It is suggested that such a form of personification might raise in Lovecraft’s readers a dimly resonant recall of a superstitious world, a world in which liminal objects and object-places (such as castles) had once been psychologically ‘enchanted’ with both dread and wonder. Such personification of earthly ‘things’ might also be understood as foreshadowing Lovecraft’s later deployment of monstrous cosmic forces in his fiction, outer entities that indifferently understand humans only as ‘things’. (The essay somewhat feeds into academic theory’s current notions of trans-species psychology, a future eco-animism, and a post-human planet).
28 Wednesday Nov 2018
Posted in New books
Revista Pangea has a new interview in Italian with the editor of the book of translations on Lovecraft’s theory of horror, Teoria dell’orrore. The interview is too long to translate and a translation would anyway probably mangle the technical terms, but running it through Google Translate should give you the gist of it.
28 Wednesday Nov 2018
Posted in New books, Scholarly works
A new blog post from S. T. Joshi. He’s planning to travel to Paris in May 2019, for the formal launch of Je Suis Providence, and he notes…
One of the people I hope to meet in Paris is Martine Chifflot, a professor at Universite Lyon who has just issued a charming little book, Howard, Mon Amour (Aigle Botte Editions, 2018). This slim (88 pp.) is a series of 23 scenes [from Lovecraft’s domestic life]
Ah, ‘Paris in ze springtime’…. nice. Hopefully with the scent of apple-blossom and coffee drifting down the boulevards, rather than (as currently seem more likely, from the news) the scent of petrol-bombs.
The book, at 88 pages and originally a play of “23 spooky and musical scenes”, sounds like it might make for the basis of an interesting graphic novel in English translation? The market for ‘Lovecraft’s life as graphic novel’ might seem to be becoming a little crowded, but the three we have so far seem only to have scratched the surface with broad surveys. There are ‘worlds within worlds’ in Lovecraft’s life that could be focussed down on in 120 pages.
Joshi also notes he has a screenplay in progress, which will focus down on Sonia and Lovecraft…
“The appearance of this book is very serendipitous, as it partly echoes the themes in my own screenplay of the film The Lovecrafts on which Ryan Grulich and I are currently working.”