“This piquant debating finally got into print…”

I’m told the Gothic Studies academics at universities mostly don’t much care for Lovecraft, feeling he doesn’t fit in with their canon or their leftist politics. But if you were considering starting an academic journal a touch more friendly to the old gent, then note there’s to be a Gothic Networking Day for postgraduates and academics. It’s in Manchester in the north-west of England, on the 12th July 2014. It will including an afternoon of sessions on publishing academic journals in Gothic Studies, so you’ll get to meet some of the people who are already editing such journals — of which the UK now has quite a few.

Time-travelling shadows

A nice bit of techno-hauntology from the UK…

Shadowing, a project developed [in the old port city of Bristol, England] by Jonathan Chomko and Matthew Rosier, uses infrared tracking and triggered projections to replay the shadow of a previous passerby to the next person who walks under a modified streetlight. The design duo hopes that the reanimation of the city streets with ghostly time-travellers will be a playful experience for everyone, but also recognises the potentially darker side of the shadows.”

playable-city-shadowing

David V. Bush

Here’s a picture of the man who kept Lovecraft in steady revision work through the mid 1920s. Lovecraft revised a whole lot of Bush’s poetry, and sometimes also wrote whole chapters of Bush’s homespun popular psychology pamphlets and books — such as two or three chapters for Applied Psychology and Scientific Living.

bush1924Ad in the front pages ads section of Popular Science, Jan 1924.

Presumably Lovecraft wasn’t invited to ghost Bush’s sex manuals such as Psychology of Sex: How to Make Love and Marry (c.1924), with chapters such as “What To Do On The Wedding Night, And Why Not To Be Ashamed Of One’s Sexual Urges”. One does, though, wonder if Bush may have felt Lovecraft eminently suited to ghost-write his pamphlet Spunk (How to Lick Fear) (c. early 1924). Here it is noted that it is “declared to be the masterpiece” of Bush’s work. Hyperbolic sales talk, perhaps, but if Lovecraft had tackled it — writing on a subject he was expert on — then it might indeed have been rather a good read…

fearPopular Science, July 1926.

Edge of Tomorrow and Lovecraft

I found the new feature film Edge of Tomorrow to be excellent entertainment, and the best sci-fi film of the year so far. Admittedly in the first 25 minutes there’s some clunky setup to wade through, and a difficult scenario for a Brit audience to get used to. That naff ‘dropships over the White Cliffs of Dover’ scene was perhaps the low point in the setup. It probably works best if you just tell yourself: “ok, so we’re in an alternative future-past”, rather than trying to reconcile the starting scenario with actual history. But after the setup the film just keeps on getting better, and does so right through to the end.

Edge-of-Tomorrow-final-poster

Edge of Tomorrow borrows a few Lovecraftian elements, which I don’t think I’m spoiling the plot by mentioning: aliens arrive on a meteorite and creep outward from there (“Colour out of Space”); the aliens send location-based ‘visions’ to those who are ‘sensitive’ (“Call of Cthulhu”). Then there’s the very cool visual style of the aliens, which riffs off Lovecraft (with friendly nods to H.G. Wells and H.R. Giger). But then Lovecraft gets neatly mashed into other highly entertaining elements (such as an alternative future-past London, done in a cool big-budget Doctor Who / James Bond / WWII ish sort of way; Starship Troopers; and the time-looping movies Source Code and Looper). It’s highly recommended, and is probably best seen without watching a trailer or reading up on the plot on Wikipedia.

Admittedly the competition for “best sci-fi film of the year” is currently very light, with only the good-in-parts X-Men: Days of Future Past as any real competition. Depp’s AI takeover movie Transcendence was dire, like a pot-poiling romantic novelist’s version of what a sci-fi thriller should be.

Of course Edge of Tomorrow is going to face some competition for Best Sci-fi of 2014:

* Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (In its post-apocalyptic ape-human war setting. Post-apocalypse earth seems a very tired-out idea these days);

* Luc Besson’s Lucy (Luc Besson’s over-the-top take on Limitless with Scarlett Johansson, ’nuff said);

* Monsters: Dark Continent (Seems to be a Heart of Darkness meets Starship Troopers bug-hunt, which sounds very easy to do badly);

* I Origins (Apparently an explosions-free serious drama on scientific discovery vs. faith. I’d guess at a ‘we were created by aliens and I can prove it…’ theme?);

* Jupiter Ascending (The Wachowskis do Space Opera, apparently in a wildly kitsch style. Sounds fun, in a kind of Japanese anime ‘it makes no sense at all, but looks great’ way);

* Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy (Seems to be a feel-good space opera romp, aimed at a younger audience and their merchandise-buying moms);

* There’s also the forthcoming The Maze Runner, the premise of which (‘boy trapped in a massive alien maze’) seems a touch similar to the Lovecraft/Sterling story “In the Walls of Eryx”.

Lovecraft’s connections

The Night Land Journal takes an interest in Henry Kuttner and C.L. Moore, who were late correspondents of Lovecraft who later married each other…

“…Lovecraft had borrowed some books from Moore, which he then loaned to Kuttner. Lovecraft gave Kuttner the address of “Sister Katy” (as Lovecraft called Moore) and asked Kuttner to return the books to Moore. Kuttner did, though he addressed the package to “Mr. C.L. Moore.” Catherine wrote back to Henry, telling him that she was definitely a “Miss,” not a “Mr..” This initial correspondence begat further New York to Indiana correspondence, which begat a Kuttner-Moore face-to-face meeting in 1938 (in California, which both were visiting at the time). The two wrote to each other for another year and a half before they married, in 1940.”

“A card here, a letter there, a years’ long correspondence becomes a romance, then a marriage that becomes the basis for one of the most remarkable literary combinations of all time. Kuttner, Moore, Lovecraft, et al. Combinations and connections. Book project, anyone?”

A visual infographic of all of the web of Lovecraft’s correspondence interconnections would certainly make for a fascinating giant wall-chart. Kickstarter, anyone?

Added to Open Lovecraft

* Joseph Young (2010), Secondary Worlds in Pre Tolkienian Fantasy Fiction. (PhD for the University of Otago, New Zealand. Has thirty pages on “H.P. Lovecraft’s Cosmic Witch Hunt”)

* Claes Thoren (2007), “Creating Real Imaginary Worlds: Mythopoeic Interaction and Immersion in Digital Games” (Masters dissertation for the University of East London. Detailed analysis of the now-classic videogame Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth)

* Brandon Jernigan (2010), “Forms of some intenser life”: Genre and imperialism at the turn of the century (PhD thesis for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Tangentially related. Seeks to detect critical attitudes to new global networks in the flexible and mutable genre fiction of Joseph Conrad, H.G. Wells, Bram Stoker and Algernon Blackwood. Chapter Four is: “Hostile swarms and geo-insurgency in weird fiction”, although this looks primarily at Blackwood)

Claremont Review

There’s a new essay on Lovecraft in the latest Claremont Review of Books. Sadly it’s behind a paywall at present.

clare

But it will probably eventually be available in public, as the Claremont‘s texts rapidly become free as the issues get older. In the meanwhile, Hyperboreans may enjoy this Feb 2014 review essay which rather unfortunately gushes about books that take the “Atlantean Electro-Pyramids Discovered Antarctica!” approach to pre-history. A fun “what if…?” read, but what we know of the real story (and its tantalising millennia-long gaps) is better read up on in the excellent After the Ice: A Global Human History, 20,000—5,000 BC and by learning the hard facts about the recent discovery of Gobekli Tepe.