Public domain in 2022

Who and what is entering the public domain early in 2022, for nations following the 70 year rule (author died in 1951)?

* Algernon Blackwood, author of the famous story “The Willows” etc. He needs no introduction here.

* Richard Malden, churchman and sometime writer of British ghost-stories. These are collected in the book Nine Ghosts (1942), and were said to have been written for his friend and fellow ghost-story writer M.R. James.

* Gelett Burgess, all-round American humourist and wit, novelist and nonsense poet at the cusp of modernism. Introduced Cubism to the American public with his article “The Wild Men of Paris”. Creator of the 1920s comic-strip infants ‘The Goops’, who had earlier appeared in his humorous books on infant manners. Produced books of parody such as The Rubaiyat of Omar Cayenne, and a mystery-detective book The Master of Mysteries: Being an Account of the Problems Solved By Astro, Seer of Secrets (1912), this being “a cycle of short mystery stories featuring an eccentric amateur sleuth” — said to be an Armenian con-man who reluctantly has to do good.

* Bernhard Kellerman, noted for the best-selling science-fiction novel of a transatlantic tunnel, Der Tunnel (1913). This being said to be set in an alternative future in which the First World War had not happened. Built to “promote world peace” the tunnel apparently precipitates war and a great recession. The book was said to be gripping despite its bitter ironies and was filmed four times (mostly very badly, apparently). Translated into English as The Tunnel (Macaulay and Co., 1915). He is said to have written many short stories, and some dime novels after he was effectively banned from publishing by the Nazis, and so it’s possible that some more of his work might also have been science-fiction?

* Abraham Cahan, founding editor of the Jewish Daily Forward. Novels and stories of Yiddish New York City at the turn of the century, in English, such as Yekl: A Tale of the New York Ghetto (1896, filmed as Hester Street) and the New York career tale The Rise of David Levinsky (1917).

* Lloyd Cassel Douglas, one of the most popular authors of his era, now best known for his ‘Jesus & disciples epics’ such as The Robe and The Big Fisherman. Also a writer of medical ‘doctor’s diary’ casebook novels, of a type once popular.

* Isabel C. Clarke, prolific Catholic novelist. Once very well-known, she now seems to be completely forgotten even by Catholics. Definitely ‘not a Tolkien’, it seems, as she stuck with domestic settings. But did produce several biographies of writers, including Haworth Parsonage: A Picture Of The Bronte Family. It’s not impossible that the latter could be the basis of a new graphic novel or movie.

* Peter Cheyney, once one of the richest British genre authors but now forgotten. Wrote best-selling “American style hard boiled” crime novels in the 1930s and 40s. Some of the plots might be usefully lifted into new science-fiction settings?

* Joseph Conrad’s Congo diaries that were the source for his Heart of Darkness. To be found in print in Last Essays, which it appears has somehow remained in copyright until 2022.

* J.C. Leyendecker, famous American cover-artist and leading designer for magazines. Handsome and gay, his life could make for a new costume-drama bio-pic, feature documentary, graphic novel etc — and presumably much of the art will now be public domain if it wasn’t already?

* Hermann Broch, Austrian novelist described as a “metaphysical realist”, apparently merging mathematics and mysticism. A trilogy of late post-war novels is also said to have explored the rise of German Nazism and depicted different ‘Nazi types’. There are apparently translations, but these are presumably not going into the public domain. Still, there may be short stories needing translation.

* The French writer Andre Gide, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature. Though, for the Anglosphere, his work and letters will be in translation and these will not be going into the public domain. But he should be up for new unexpurgated translations. Some may also look to France in 1926, hoping it will lead to American public domain materials. But while Breton’s Surrealism and Painting and Aragon’s surrealist/psychogeographic Paris Peasant are both 1926, they were not translated and published in America at that time.

* Andrei Platonovich Platonov, an early writer of strange Russian science-fiction. Wrote a science-fiction trilogy in the 1920s, Descendants of the Sun, The Lunar Bomb, and Ethereal Trail. But he started to doubt the glorious socialist revolution, and a few years later his 15 year-old son was sent to what was effectively a death-camp and Platonov’s name was removed from the books on Communist literature. He continued to write “for the bottom drawer” but was hardly published except for some re-writes of folk-tales. His work does not seem to have been translated into English until fairly recently.


In the USA, works published and films released in 1926 will enter the public domain. Some of the authors below may well already be in the public domain.

* Spengler’s famous 1918 The Decline of the West… “appeared in its English edition in 1926” in both the USA and UK.

* Hugo Gernsback’s futuristic travel-tale novel Ralph 124C 41+: A Romance of the Year 2660 (1926 in book form). “Can be defended as the most important science-fiction novel ever written”, for encapsulating and launching an entire pulp genre (Gary Westfahl, The Mechanics of Wonder: The Creation of the Idea of Science Fiction). Seems most likely to become a full-cast audio adaptation, with sound FX?

* T.E. Lawrence’s Seven Pillars of Wisdom. The famously lucid autobiography of desert warfare, later beautifully filmed as Lawrence of Arabia. It’s difficult to see how a graphic novel version or movie remake might compete against David Lean’s masterpiece. But Lawrence died 1935, so it must already be public domain.

* Ronald Firbank’s Concerning the Eccentricities of Cardinal Pirelli, said to be a posthumously published satiric Wildean comedy, of camp libidinous priests and cardinals with predilections for winsome choristers. Might make for a wild Joe Orton / Ronald Searle / Terry Gilliam -style animation?

* Edna Ferber’s 1926 novel Show Boat… “chronicles the lives of three generations of performers on the Cotton Blossom, a floating theatre on a steamboat that travels between small towns along the banks of the Mississippi River, from the 1880s to the 1920s.” Became a Broadway musical theatre hit. Possibly the property with the most TV mini-series potential, but it would be expensive to do in full costume, with boats and landscapes. Political correctness would probably now make it impossible to get the idea past producers, anyway.

* John Metcalfe’s weird collection The Smoking Leg, and other stories (1925). The 1926 U.S. first edition should put it in the public domain in the USA in 2022. In it Lovecraft especially admired the tale “The Bad Lands”.

* The highly acclaimed biography Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years.

* Honor Willsie Morrow, Splendid Journey. Best-selling stark and epic novel. Published as an adult book, but then taken up in a big way by what publishers would now term ‘young adults’. The story of a thirteen year old lad on the Oregon Trail, drawing on many old letters and reminiscences of a real party of children crossing America in the 1860s. Has obvious potential for adaptations or, for fewer problems with political correctness, translation into genres such as fantasy or science-fiction.

* “The Cowboy and His Interpreters, which appeared in 1926, has been a standard reference for nearly three decades” (from The American cowboy: the myth & the reality, 1955).

* Letters from a Roman Gentleman, being the selected and translated letters of Cicero in one volume, published by the University of California. Latin Notes called it “delightful” in 1927. Seems to have audiobook potential.

* The best-selling non-specialist Story of Philosophy, being… “a brilliant and concise account of the lives and ideas of the great philosophers”. Approachable chapters on Friedrich Nietzsche and George Santayana may make the book of interest to philosophic Lovecraftians. The revised second edition of 1933 will not be public domain.

* “S.L. MacGregor Mathers’ translation of The Kabbalah from the Hebrew originally appeared in 1926″.

* Graham Wallas published The Art of Thought, a well-regarded book on creativity and the creative process.

* Vita Sackville-West’s book The Land, an epic narrative poem of the British landscape, seasons and history. The ‘book-length poem’ format is not at all to modern tastes, but it could well make for an abridged graphic novel or radio adaptation.

* Carl Van Vechten’s breakthrough novel Trigger Heaven, about black life in Harlem in the early-mid 1920s. The Bookman said it did not “preach” but termed it “gaudy”, with its cast of characters being deemed a rather inauthentic mix of “blackface” and “whitewash”.

* The romantic ’90s by Richard Le Gallienne. A brisk and vivid survey of the decadents of the 1890s, and a book published on both sides of the Atlantic. Many of the writers and artists were or had been his friends.

* The Catholic writer Achmed Abdullah’s The Year of the Wood-Dragon (1926). “An American boy’s adventures on a journey into the interior of Tibet.” He was the screenplay writer for The Thief of Bagdad.

* Abraham Merritt’s 1926 book version of his 1924 The Ship of Ishtar, and Ships. Apparently a rip-roaring supernatural fantasy, that sold well and later influenced early D&D.

* Arthur Conan Doyle’s late novel The Land of Mist. Apparently a rather morbid pro-spiritualism novel, which only used his Professor Challenger character in places. His two-volume The History of Spiritualism appeared the same year. By this time Doyle was quite literally ‘away with the fairies’.

* Stanley Unwin’s The Truth about Publishing. “A fascinating insight into the problems, perils and delights of publishing books.” It went through eight editions. Could make for an engaging and bookish non-fiction graphic novel, if the subject matter is still relevant.

* Two biographical Poe books appeared in 1926, one “unscholarly and poorly organised” with little new information, and one an armchair “attempt at Freudian analysis”. Though, at the time of publication, Lovecraft found them useful as on-the-ground guidebooks to finding little-known Poe places.

* An insight into the Lovecraft era of astronomy, with Harlow Shapley’s Starlight, a ‘popular science’ book, and also Florence Armstrong Grondal’s more poetic Music of the Spheres: A Nature Lover’s Astronomy. Both entering the public domain in the USA.

* Joseph Pennell’s Pictures of Philadelphia. See Lovecraft’s Letters to Family, re: his long visit there. 64 lithographs, could be paired with Lovecraft’s text.

* Anne of Green Gables author Lucy Maud Montgomery’s The Blue Castle (1926) one of her two novels meant for adults. About an old maid in Canada who finds escape via literature and… “soon her daydreams about the Blue Castle turn into reality”.

* The Boy Through the Ages, a well-researched book on the daily life of boys from early times to the 19th century, cheerfully written for boys. British but appears to have had a New York edition variously listed as being published by “Doubleday Doran and Co.” or “George H. Doran” in 1926.

* The Velveteen Rabbit, a best-selling young children’s story book of 1926, published on both side of the Atlantic. Now very rare in original editions though, due to being extremely collectable. The same author also wrote the werewolf novel The Thing in the Woods under a pen-name.

* Felix Salten’s Bambi, A Life in the Woods.

* Enid Blyton’s Book of Brownies skips into the public domain in the USA. Brownies here being an old British word for ‘pixies’.

* “Bomba the Jungle Boy, published in 1926″ and popular then. Pulp or thereabouts, said to be “not unlike a youthful Tarzan”.

* Everything in Weird Tales for 1926. Inc. “The City of Spiders” by H. Warner Munn. Said to be “one of the best tales of giant spiders ever written” and thus a possible front story for a new anthology of such. His “The Werewolf of Ponkert” (1925) went into the public domain last year, and its 1927 companion will go in January 2023, “The Werewolf’s Daughter” (1928) following in 2024. His various related “Werewolf Clan” tales will then go over the following few years.

* Kipling’s penultimate collection of stories and poems, Debits and Credits. Kingsley Amis remarked of it… “some self-indulgent fantasy, some exercises in the supernatural … three good stories.”

* “In an interview published in Collier’s magazine in 1926, Nikola Tesla, then in the twilight of his career, made some predictions about the future”. Depending on the verbosity, it might be the basis for an interesting 45-minute radio-play?

* Personae: The Collected Poems of Ezra Pound, published in New York in 1926. This was… “his personal choice of all the poems he wished to keep in print other than some translations and his Cantos.”

* Lovecraft’s fellow writer and poet Hart Crane apparently sees his first collection, White Buildings, enter the public domain in the USA.

* Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage… “first appeared in 1926”. Though possibly not in the USA?

* The three volume 1926 Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

* And of course the original Winnie the Pooh book, the title that will be endlessly parroted by journalists come January 2022. I’d expect that Disney has kept some kind of lock on its own cartoon depiction of the famous bear, and probably also trademarks in relation to how the character names are presented — so it’s not a Pooh free-for-all. But expect things like “Pooh-thlu” or “Poohthulhu” mash-ups mixing Pooh and Cthulhu.


* In music, H.P. Lovecraft’s favourite barbershop song of 1904, “Sweet Adeline” sung by The Haydn Quartet, also comes out of copyright in 2022 due to a 1951 death. I’ll get in first with a “Sweet Azathoth” version…

Sweet Azathoth,
My Azathoth,
At night, drear heart,
For you I pine.
In all my dreams,
Your cosmic beams.
You’re the idiot of my heart,
Sweet Azathoth. (My Azathoth.)

Also certain Caruso opera recordings, in the USA.


In movies, some of the key 1926 movies are:

Douglas Fairbanks’s The Black Pirate.
Buster Keaton’s The General.
Mary Pickford’s Sparrows.
Rudolph Valentino’s The Son of the Sheikh.
The German Faust.

I’m uncertain if Lotte Reiniger’s debut The Adventures of Prince Achmed was released in America in 1926. As a feature-length animation (then an unfamiliar form) it apparently had a troubled distribution history even in Germany.


Canada and South Africa and other nations which follow the 50 year rule (author died in 1971) get…

* C. M. Eddy, Lovecraft’s Providence friend and collaborator.
* August Derleth.
* John Wood Campbell Jr. (science-fiction author, famous editor of Analog).
* S. Foster Damon (William Blake expert).
* Virgil Finlay, the key early Lovecraft illustrator.

So Canadians get to re-write and tighten Derleth’s mythos with all the dross taken out, if they want.

On the earliest use of “weird fiction”

The earliest use of the term “weird fiction” I can find is in the Australian Journal, 1872, said of a ghostly oral tale of the outback…

Interestingly the headless horseman of British lore was here transformed by the Australians from a fearsome spectre into an aloof guardian, or so it might seem.

The term moves into literary use with The Library Table, 1878, used of Gaboriau-esque detective mysteries set in the dank and decaying pre-Haussmann city of Paris…

1879, from a survey of The Homes of America, said in passing of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow tales of Washington Irving…

In summer 1894 there appears a well-reviewed anthology of the “weirdest Oriental stories” … “weird literature of the East”, as retold by aficionado Lafcadio Hearn.

The genre is now well known if diffuse, and in 1892 the Mormon Young Woman’s Journal takes care to distinguish children’s fairy stories from “weird literature”.

The first journalistic use that can be found, by a book reviewer using it in the modern sense we would recognise today, is from 1894. From Philadelphia, Lippincott’s Monthly, November 1894, “Book Notes”. This credits Poe as the inventor, but also notes the German influence…

Evidently we are not talking here about folk tales, fairy stories, ghost stories, Oriental stories or early Parisian detectives. The fine evocation of atmosphere is a key element, and this implies a readership willing and able to savour it rather than rush ahead to the next penny-dreadful ‘shock’.

Can anyone beat 1894, with the term used in the modern sense?

There was probably then some throwback of the term, using to ‘net’ earlier fiction that might have once been classified differently. Here, for instance is “weird fiction” in popular newspaper use in February 1905 in Canada, by a literary critic remarking on an aspect of the famous Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886). The clever editor has run a suitable but unrelated cartoon next to the article.

Northeast monsters

The Northeast Popular Culture/American Culture Association seeks…

papers that explore and highlight the Northeast’s contributions to monster lore, including authors, events, individuals, locations, and, of course, monsters.

This is for an online session. Proposals by: 1st August 2021. I can’t find a map of what they count as being “Northeast” (now there’s an opportunity for an map-artist/illustrator, potentially) but it definitely includes New England.

Rather surprisingly there appears to be no New England historical folk bestiary other than the 64-page children’s book Ghastly Perils of the Great Outdoors (1986), though I’m not sure how historically grounded its whimsies are…

Here for the first time the truth about the Womkeag, Rumweevil, Gouger, Pakroc and dozens of other snaggers, shuckers, nitters, fumblers, grinders, chuckers, and twangers infesting the Great Outdoors

Possibly the region is just too big to bring sales for a comprehensive survey, since most likely readers will only be interested in their own smaller sub-region? From a British perspective it would probably be like expecting people to be interested in a survey from the Orkneys in Scotland down to Brittany in northern France. When what you really want is a county survey. However, the region’s sea monsters are surveyed in The Great New England Sea Serpent (1999) and several other books.

Possibly a good stocking-filler for a child in New England?

More notes on Letters to Family

I’ve now reached 1925 in Letters to Family. Bringing the notes up to date…

* In summer 1924 Arthur Leeds was at the Cort on 49th Street, New York City, but moved across the road to the Ray in September. The Cort appears to have been a theatre, not a hotel?

* Loveman was working at Stone’s rare bookshop in the autumn of 1924, on 4th Ave. & 13th St. Publishers Weekly of the period has this as “Stone’s Book Store”, and it had been long established. There are no photos to be had at 1940s.nyc.

* Lovecraft saw Poe’s Planters’ Hotel twice (at least) in 1924, and he and his circle explored Greenwich Village extensively. Colonial districts of the city tended to abound with cats, adding to their appeal to Lovecraft.

* Lovecraft remarks that African “Congo masks” were in vogue among New York’s modernist artists in summer 1924.

* Lovecraft usually approached Morton’s place in Harlem “from downtown”. Several Kalem Club meetings were held there, and Lovecraft was not averse to walking through Harlem in the early hours of the morning.

* Sechrist appears to have had a book of the Polynesian tales he collected and translated while living with a storytelling clan, for which he was seeking a publisher. Evidently it never appeared.

* A month prior to Lovecraft’s move to Red Hook, Long rather cheekily gave him a book in praise of the monastic life, which Lovecraft enjoyed and devoured avidly. We also get more detail about the famous The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, read by Lovecraft in November 1924. It was a library copy, borrowed for Lovecraft by Long, and thus did not come from the Wandrei collection of early science fiction. Lovecraft thought it gripping from start to finish.

* We learn the price of Loveman’s radio (later stolen from Lovecraft’s room on the edge of Red Hook). It was very expensive, a powerful “$100” radio set and evidently portable as it made an appearance at several Kalem meetings.

* Lovecraft comments on getting some 10 and 5 cent scrapbooks for his press and magazine cuttings collection. [This did not happen, it seems].

* Trigger-ban’s eyes were green, not the common yellow.

Ernest La Touche Hancock

I now have a full version of the caricature of Lovecraft’s New York friend and correspondent Ernest La Touche Hancock (1857-1926). It was only available previously as a tiny thumbnail, back in 2013.

The name on the donkey appears to be “Pegasus” (the immortal winged horse of myth), and the lettering on the tiny toon tableau in the bottom-right corner cannot be read. The figure in the Union Flag waistcoat is “John Bull”, the archetypal beef-fed 18th century British squire. Hancock wears a small ‘mortar board’ hat, which once symbolised a teacher. The only thing that can be fathomed today is “John Bull” — like Lovecraft, Hancock was an ardent Anglophile.

Hancock was familiar with many cartoonists of the 1890-1925 period and his long survey article “The American Comic and Caricature Art” (the American The Bookman, Nov 1902), he praised the young Herriman of Krazy Kat fame: “Art combined with poetry is the characteristic of George Herriman. Were his drawings not so well known one would think he had mistaken his vocation.” It’s thus not impossible that Hancock, knowing of Lovecraft’s liking for cats, might have mentioned the poetick Kat in a letter.

‘Picture postals’ from Lovecraft: family carriages and fine views

This week, more on the transport theme. Letters to Family briefly reveals that, as a young boy, Lovecraft and his grandfather used to drive out in a horse and carriage/gig named “Tom”. Evidently they would enjoy getting purposely lost in the country east of Providence…

… we wandered interestingly in the young dusk, and became picturesquely lost — as when Grandpa and I used to get lost driving “Tom” in East Providence — on some unknown height…

The implication here is that, being lost, he and Grandpa would then need to find elevated viewing points to drive up to or halt by, presumably partly to-reorient themselves but also to enjoy unexpected views.

(The above quote is not indexed: in the Index to Letters to Family add “p. 145” to Phillips, Whipple and to Lovecraft, H.P. … and Whipple Phillips).

Not Lovecraft and his grandfather, but evocative of riding “Tom” into a field to enjoy a sunset vista.

These were the days before any substantial automobile ownership, and it would have been very safe and quiet on the roads and lanes. Most likely the field and track gates were only latched, not padlocked as they might be now. The only danger and noise was likely from the occasional fierce farm-dog, but dog training was far better in those days and they were also trained not to spook horses.

What was “Tom”? Possibly Lovecraft’s “Tom” was a large four-seater family ‘city carriage’ with the sides down or off for the better weather, but the type of East Providence backroads and lanes travelled probably meant this was not practical. The roads, especially back-roads on which one might become lost, would not have been as good as today. True, the turnpikes (toll-roads) had been abandoned in Rhode Island by the 1880s, and a decade or two later one could go where one liked. But the patchwork of local upkeep is said to have left much to be desired, being good in places, but poor and uneven a mile further on, then good again. Rhode Island’s famous scientific ‘road surfacing’ experiment was not until 1907. This saw the laying of 14 ‘experimental sections’ to discover which was the best-wearing and most dust-free option. They were, surprisingly, the first such state in the nation to actually do such rigorous tests and the results came in 1909. A simple mix of “tar with natural stone macadam” beat all the fancy expensive mixes that contractors recommended. But the state’s new roads were not laid until after 1909. Thus the pre-tarmac roads encountered by Lovecraft and his grandpa circa 1895-1900 would have been quite varied, especially if one was trying to take a semi-random route in outlying rural districts.

The unpaved road to Warren, in the far south of East Providence.

This means that a city-type carriage was probably not practical. Could there have been another lighter buggy-style carriage? Well we know the family kept several “carriages”, before financial problems meant…

the horses and carriages were sold too, so that I had a gorgeous, glorious, titanic, and unbelievable new playhouse — the whole great stable with its immense carriage room, its neat-looking ‘office’, and its vast upstairs, with the colossal (almost scareful) expanse of the grain loft…

Lovecraft somewhat hazily recalled this loss/gain as being “ca. 1895”, but S.T. Joshi dates the departure of the carriages and live-in coachman-groom a little later…

“when the coachmen left (probably around 1900)” (I Am Providence).

Whatever the dating we can thus be sure there were once several horse-drawn vehicles, hence the large size of the stable. The trips with his grandfather could then equally have been in a lighter runabout gig of the sort seen above. Possibly the formative vista-seeking trips were enjoyed when Lovecraft aged four or five, but if Joshi’s “1900” dating is a better informed guess they may have been a little later, perhaps at age seven or eight.

Anyway the dating of the stable probably does not matter for the dating of the trips. Since I assume that a sixty-something businessman like Grandpa Whipple would have still required hired horse transport to get around, even if he could no longer afford to have it located in the home stable. Experts on the Whipple finances may know more, but my guess is that he retained local access to at least a horse and buggy, even if it had to be hired in from nearby. He also likely retained the local ‘pull’ to borrow one from a friendly neighbour on a fine evening, even if finances were tight.

As quick-eyed photographers know, being on a bicycle (ideally tirelessly electric, or in this case a horse-buggy) enables one to discover exponentially more photographic possibilities than when plodding along on foot. If getting psychogeographically lost on purpose to find “picturesque” sights, Grandpa’s random turnings and likely exploration of spectrally embowered by-ways must have had much the same effect, offering many more ‘picture views’ than for the walker. I assume that the views were not simply for mundane re-orientation after becoming lost, and would have been enjoyed for their own sake.

But I also suspect the apparently random nature of the trips were about more than stacking up the probabilities of finding a really good near-sunset view. Recall, for instance, that his grandfather also gave the boy other forms of training at this time, such as finding his way through what Lovecraft called “a certain chains of dark rooms” to cure his fear of the dark. On a New York walk he recalled that he had also enjoyed becoming purposely lost in the local Cat Swamp as a boy…

Remembering that I had no map & knew nothing of the country, [I went] trusting with chance with a very agreeable sense of adventure into the unknown; just as I used to enjoy getting “lost” on walks around Cat Swamp, East Providence, or somewhere, with you [his aunt], Gramp, or my mother in the early and middle ‘nineties.” Letters to Family, page 421.

These things were also a form of navigation training. Thus getting lost with “Tom” could also have been another form of training, with purposeful random turnings aiming to teach the boy some skills of ‘natural navigation’ (the sort of things now found in best-selling books such as The Natural Navigator). But, if finding the way home at dusk, then also navigation by key stars and the moon. The adult Lovecraft often displayed an aristocrat’s hazy sense of time re: being less than prompt for meetings, but he seems to have had a countryman’s navigational skills. He was able to quickly find his way in situations when his clueless companions had their heads spinning. One suspects that this innate skill was honed early, firstly with his grandfather and later independently on his bicycle.

His grandfather had, once, been a rural man likely to value such skills. There was still at the back of the family horse-stable “the orchard”, which the boy Lovecraft would regularly raid for summer fruit. And there was also a field beside the house which pastured the family cow…

… the family cow — a beloved possession reminiscent of the prehistoric Greene days ere my grandfather became an urban dweller.” (Lovecraft, letter to Kleiner)

Again, not actually the boy Lovecraft and the family cow, but somewhat evocative of the likely scene.

It was, he later recalled…

an open field with a stone wall where great elms grew [and] a cow pastured under the gardener’s care. Here, when I was five, they built me a playhouse…