Marc Giai-Miniet
12 Tuesday Aug 2014
Posted Lovecraftian arts
in12 Tuesday Aug 2014
Posted Lovecraftian arts
in11 Monday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context
inMeanwhile his [Whitehead’s] young friend & guest Allan Grayson of New York (who turns out to be a dental patient of Doc Long’s — Little Belknap’s father!) has formed a tremendous admiration for you & your work, & wants desperately to see your whole…” — Lovecraft to Derleth.
Apparently Lovecraft wrote a sonnet for Grayson, which is noted in the new Mariconda collection of essays. Can anyone supply me with a copy of the sonnet?
11 Monday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context, Lovecraftian arts
in“Death, the Avenger” (based on a description by the poet Heinrich Heine of the outbreak of cholera at a masked ball in Paris in 1831). 1851 engraving by Alfred Rethel (1816–1859), from A History of Everyday Things in England : 1733-1851.
The pestilence was awaited with comparative indifference, because the news from London was that it carried off comparatively few … [during the day] the Parisians streamed merrily to the boulevards to look at the masks, which held up to ridicule the fear of the cholera and the disease itself, by all sorts of monstrous caricatures. The public balls [that night] were fuller than ever that evening; insane peals of laughter almost drowned the music. People got heated in the Chahut, a dance of no doubtful character, swallowed ices and cold drinks … and then, all of a sudden, the gayest of the harlequins felt a strange chill in his limbs, and took off his mask; when, to the amazement of all, his face was seen to be violet blue. It was soon found that this was not a joke, and the laughter ceased; wagons full of men were taken from the hall to the hospital of the Hotel Dieu, where, all dressed in their masquerading habits, they straightway died. As the theory of infection prevailed in the first excitement, and the other inmates of the Hotel Dieu shrieked in terror, it is said that the earliest victims were so hastily buried that they were not even stripped of their motley dresses, so that they lie in the grave as merrily as they lived. — Heinrich Heine.
Presumably an influence on Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death” (1842), and also on Lovecraft’s “The Outsider”…
… the open windows — gorgeously ablaze with light and sending forth sound of the gayest revelry. Advancing to one of these I looked in and saw an oddly dressed company, indeed; making merry, and speaking brightly to one another. I had never, seemingly, heard human speech before; and could guess only vaguely what was said. Some of the faces seemed to hold expressions that brought up incredibly remote recollections; others were utterly alien. I now stepped through the low window into the brilliantly lighted room, stepping as I did so from my single bright moment of hope to my blackest convulsion of despair and realisation. The nightmare was quick to come; for as I entered, there occurred immediately one of the most terrifying demonstrations I had ever conceived. Scarcely had I crossed the sill when there descended upon the whole company a sudden and unheralded fear of hideous intensity, distorting every face and evoking the most horrible screams from nearly every throat. Flight was universal, and in the clamour and panic several fell in a swoon and were dragged away by their madly fleeing companions. Many covered their eyes with their hands, and plunged blindly and awkwardly in their race to escape; overturning furniture and stumbling against the walls before they managed to reach one of the many doors. — from “The Outsider”.
10 Sunday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context
in“A couple of years ago I found a marvellous set of 10¢ books at Woolworth’s — all pictures, but covering British history from neolithic times to the present in considerable detail. Everything illustrated — events, persons, architecture, landscape, costume, articles in common use — a veritable pictorial museum.” (Lovecraft letter to Lee McBride White, 20th December 1935)
Possibly this was the British ‘Everyday Life / Everyday Things’ series, written for intelligent older children, and mostly now online:
* Everyday Life in the Old Stone Age
* Everyday Life In The New Stone, Bronze And Early Iron Ages
* Everyday life in Roman and Anglo-Saxon times
* A History of Everyday Things in England : 1066-1499
* A History of Everyday Things in England: 1500-1799
* A History of Everyday Things in England : 1733-1851
08 Friday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context
inThis essay has been replaced by the essay in my new book of revised, expanded, and footnoted versions of my recent Tentaclii essays, Lovecraft in Historical Context: fifth collection.
07 Thursday Aug 2014
Posted Odd scratchings
inUpcoming “Lovecraft Readathon” at Providence Public Library on 23rd August 2014, 7pm-10pm. Public readers can only sign up to give a five minute reading, but there will be three full story readings.
Those in Rhode Island can also celebrate H.P. Lovecraft’s 124th Birthday at the Central Congregational Church on 20th August 2014…
H.P. Lovecraft’s horrific masterpiece, “The Call of Cthulhu”, comes to life in this twisted one-man performance from storyteller David Neilsen. […] Then, take a “sitting tour” of locations in Lovecraft’s Providence. In this informative and entertaining slideshow, Lovecraft scholar Donovan K. Loucks — webmaster of The H.P. Lovecraft Archive at HPLovecraft.com — will present photos of dozens of places on Providence’s East Side related to Lovecraft’s life and works. […] This event is a joint production of Hamilton House, The H.P. Lovecraft Archive, and The Lovecraft Arts and Sciences Council.
06 Wednesday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context
inA new BoingBoing article on William S. Burroughs’s centipede fixation. The article is of interest to Lovecraftians for the short section on Robert Barlow, for which skip to the line… “The source of Burroughs’s centipede fixation lies, most likely, in his Mexico City days.”
The BoingBoing author then claims that a field “trip to the Temple of Quetzalcoatl in Teotihuacan”, with Barlow in the lead, led Burroughs to discover/imagine the “thought-controlling Mayan theocracy, manipulating the serfs through pictographs and punishing thought criminals with Death in Centipede”. This was later used by Burroughs in his fiction, with the first instance said to have been in the 1951-1953 Queer.
The BoingBoing information on the Temple of Quetzalcoatl field trip seems to have come from Barry Miles’s new biography Call Me Burroughs: A Life (2014) which confirms the Barlow connection…
Burroughs studied the Mayan Codices under Robert Hayward Barlow
Miles states Burroughs had his studies funded under the G.I. Bill and that he started classes 3rd January for the Winter/Spring semester, with Barlow. It appears the field trip was July 1950, just six months before Barlow died. Many of the American students at the College were just there for the sun, the G.I. Bill grant money, the Mexican sense of privacy and the amenable local youths…
[In Mexico] “everyone has mastered the art of minding his own business. If a man wants to wear a monocle or carry a cane he does not hesitate to do it and no one gives him a second glance. Boys and young men walk down the street arm in arm and no one pays them any mind. It is not that people here don’t care what others think. It simply would not occur to a Mexican to expect criticism from a stranger, nor would it occur to anyone to criticize the behaviour of others.” (William S. Burroughs)
But it seems that Burroughs was genuinely interested in the ancient Maya, since he had studied the Mayan Codices in Algiers, and later joined a student archaeological society in Mexico City.
It’s curious to think of the possibilities, in terms of weird fiction, that the landscape of the newly-discovered Mexican ruins lost at that moment. What would have happened if Burroughs had tapered off his drug habit and Barlow and he had become a couple, meaning that Barlow survived the blackmail attempt?
[Hat-tip: Miss Allen]
06 Wednesday Aug 2014
Posted Odd scratchings
inPulpfest 2014 lands in Ohio, USA, tomorrow…
06 Wednesday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context
inJoyce Carol Oates’s highly influential Halloween 1996 Lovecraft review, in The New York Review of Books: “The King of Weird”. Currently free online, without need for a sign-up.
05 Tuesday Aug 2014
Posted Lovecraftian arts, Podcasts etc.
inFull free audio reading of Clark Ashton Smith’s “The Vaults of Yoh-Vombis” (Weird Tales, May 1932), read by Iker Rivercast. Commonly said to be Smith’s most Lovecraftian story. The Double Shadow, the Clark Ashton Smith podcast, also has a discussion and partial audio reading from “The Vaults of Yoh-Vombis” which would be a good follow-up Iker’s reading.
04 Monday Aug 2014
Posted Historical context, Lovecraftian arts
inEdithemad’s work-in-progress Cthulhu statuette. Based on the rough sketch that Lovecraft’s limited art skills were capable of, to suggest the basics of the cultists’ alien statuette of Cthulhu…
The statuette, idol, fetish, or whatever it was, had been captured some months before in the wooded swamps south of New Orleans during a raid on a supposed voodoo meeting; and so singular and hideous were the rites connected with it, that the police could not but realise that they had stumbled on a dark cult totally unknown to them, and infinitely more diabolic than even the blackest of the African voodoo circles. Of its origin, apart from the erratic and unbelievable tales extorted from the captured members, absolutely nothing was to be discovered … No recognised school of sculpture had animated this terrible object, yet centuries and even thousands of years seemed recorded in its dim and greenish surface of unplaceable stone. The figure, which was finally passed slowly from man to man for close and careful study, was between seven and eight inches in height, and of exquisitely artistic workmanship. It represented a monster of vaguely anthropoid outline, but with an octopus-like head whose face was a mass of feelers, a scaly, rubbery-looking body, prodigious claws on hind and fore feet, and long, narrow wings behind. This thing, which seemed instinct with a fearsome and unnatural malignancy, was of a somewhat bloated corpulence, and squatted evilly on a rectangular block or pedestal covered with undecipherable characters. The tips of the wings touched the back edge of the block, the seat occupied the centre, whilst the long, curved claws of the doubled-up, crouching hind legs gripped the front edge and extended a quarter of the way clown toward the bottom of the pedestal. The cephalopod head was bent forward, so that the ends of the facial feelers brushed the backs of huge fore paws which clasped the croucher’s elevated knees. The aspect of the whole was abnormally life-like, and the more subtly fearful because its source was so totally unknown. Its vast, awesome, and incalculable age was unmistakable; yet not one link did it shew with any known type of art belonging to civilisation’s youth – or indeed to any other time. Totally separate and apart, its very material was a mystery; for the soapy, greenish-black stone with its golden or iridescent flecks and striations resembled nothing familiar to geology or mineralogy. The characters along the base were equally baffling; and no member present, despite a representation of half the world’s expert learning in this field, could form the least notion of even their remotest linguistic kinship. They, like the subject and material, belonged to something horribly remote and distinct from mankind as we know it. Something frightfully suggestive of old and unhallowed cycles of life in which our world and our conceptions have no part.
The sketch was made in 1934 for Barlow. Barlow was at that time a sculptor and painter, in addition to his many other talents. According to someone who visited the untouched Lovecraft bedroom shortly after Lovecraft’s death, many of Barlow’s artworks adorned Lovecraft’s tiny bedroom in the late 1930s, along with ancient sculptures from antiquity that Loveman had given him as presents (possibly originally from the Hart Crane collection of such). One then wonders if Barlow ever tried his hand at a sculpture similar to that seen above, based on the sketch? That seems to be implied, in the text below the sketch. If so, the sculpture doesn’t seem to have survived, or it would have been known to Lovecraft fans. Possibly it’s still sitting in a junk shop or curio collector’s cabinet down Mexico City way, unregarded.
Where did Barlow’s other sculpture end up? It seems that not a whit of what he made has survived. He wrote to Clark Ashton Smith (16th May 1937) of his…
disgust at the ineffable stupidity of editors and readers [word or line skipped by Barlow or transcriber] think that some of my best recent work is in sculpture: and there I find myself confronted with another blank wall of stupidity. Oh well and oh hell: some one will make a “discovery” [of the sculpture] when I am safely dead or incarcerated…
One would like to think that there’s a crate of it in storage in the basement of a Mexico City museum, perhaps along with the lost H.S. Whitehead letters (which Barlow collected, but which mysteriously vanished).
03 Sunday Aug 2014
Posted New books
inNewly republished in paperback, the 1981 book The Gothic Novel 1790-1830: Plot Summaries and Index to Motifs.