JURN search usage patterns

I’ve found that the JURN search usage patterns conform fairly predictably to the academic year in the English-speaking world. Very slow during the long holiday in early/mid August, then building rapidly to a small peak in early September. Then a fallback until very early in October — when there’s a rapid soaring climb up to a high point which marks the start of the academic teaching year. Then JURN sees massive October/November traffic (probably more from students than academics), which slumps back (but not too far) at around about the point the Xmas party season starts in early December. Usage is still respectable then, and right through to the start of Xmas week — but as 23rd Dec hits the usage totally drops off a cliff. It then bubbles around at a low level over Xmas and New Year, before starting a slow-but-steady climb right through to a peak in mid March. There’s a predictable small slump for the Easter holidays, but usage is back up again by early April. From then on it’s a gentle downward coast to about 12th June, before several massive spikes at the end of June and the start of July (academics with time on their hands?), with lesser after-shocks of high usage through to the 15th of July.

JPASS

JSTOR is selling subscriptions to businesses and members of the general public. The fee “ranges from $19.50 for a monthly to $199.” Though it doesn’t look like a good deal at all. No access to articles published in the past three to five years. Users can only download 10 articles a month (120 a year max.). And access is only to 1,500 of JSTOR’s journals. Although I guess it might be useful for someone like a independent historian with a book contract, or perhaps an art auction house.

Scholar scuttled?

Google has obviously demoted Google Scholar over the last year or so, as well as loosening the content-inclusion parameters. Max Kemman now asks: will Google close down Google Scholar? The article notes that…

“cited by” and “related articles” functionalities in Google Scholar […] are already available in [the main Google] Search

If he’s correct, there may be another reason for it. Have people in Google taken a good look at the slow-but-sure progress of Microsoft Academic Search, and found they don’t like what they see? Is Google wary of waking up one day to find that the Microsoft tortoise has once again executed its traditional killer slow-mo back-flip karate on a competitor hare?

Digital Research Practices of Humanities Scholars (300 sample, Dutch and Belgians)

New paper on arXiv.org, “Just Google It – Digital Research Practices of Humanities Scholars”

“three hundred (N= 288) humanities scholars in the Netherlands and Belgium … General search systems such as Google and JSTOR are predominant, while large-scale collections such as Europeana [a repository of digitised versions of “Europe’s cultural and scientific heritage”] are rarely consulted. Searching with keywords is the dominant search strategy and advanced search options are rarely used. When comparing novice and more experienced searchers, the first tend to have a more narrow selection of search engines, and mostly use keywords.”

Advanced Power Searching Challenge

Take Google’s Advanced Power Searching Challenge.

I tried the first (“easy”) challenge and did it in about three minutes…

“During the glory days of radio, it was illegal to mimic the voice of the US president.” Was there actually a law prohibiting that? Or was it just a White House policy and not a legal issue?

I didn’t use any of the resources suggested. I simply pasted the question into the main Google Search, cut back “glory days”, wafted around a bit and swiftly found an indication that it was a Will Rogers who first impersonated a U.S. president on radio. Admittedly I do have my Google Search results fairly streamlined and filtered and ad-blocked. I only looked at the text snippets in the search results, and didn’t waste time clicking through.

In the next moment I formulated a Google Books search…

   “Will Rogers” “radio” “impersonation” “president”

…and instantly hit a University of Massachusetts Press book with full-view preview pages, The Dance of the Comedians: The People, the President, and the Performance of Political Standup Comedy in America, 2010. The link landed me on the correct pages, which gave the detailed story of those early radio years in a scholarly chapter. I was able to get/skim enough pages to put me on the right track, although I didn’t bother to page through to see if the actual endnotes were available. This was just a first pass.

Cutting out the “Will Rogers” name and then running the search query again as: “radio” “impersonation” “president” in Google Books gave me (first result) a full-view preview of pages inside the book The American President in Popular Culture, 2005. My first instinct was to find the publisher, as publisher details were missing for it in the Google Books sidebar. But a quick tickle of Amazon showed the book to be from Greenwood — another reliable scholarly publisher, known for their popular culture guides and encyclopedias. The landing page for this book was perfect and succinctly continued the story of presidential vocal impersonation through to the Kennedy era and into the 1990s. This initial two minutes of searching had landed me amid the precise keywords and names needed to dig out primary sources and deeper scholarship, had I wanted to.

At this point I was still at the stage of very quickly skim-reading a couple of pages of the books, to ensure I was on the right track. I had enough to be able to go back and pin down the answer to the question about the “glory days” (1920s). Also to know where to start to begin to answer the second part of the question, which specifically asked about the written law.

But at that point I knew intuitively that I could fairly swiftly also find out if impersonation was actually banned by law during: i) the authoritarian years of the later New Deal (in the late 1930s, with war approaching and FDR touchy about his image, the big radio networks such as NBC and CBS apparently did not allow him to be impersonated); ii) during wartime; and iii) during the 1950s Cold War. I had already triangulated my rough initial framework well enough, to be able to roughly bookend the search period in my mind: Will Rogers used presidential impersonation frequently, and Kennedy loved being vocally impersonated. I already knew that in the 1970s ‘Tricky Dicky’ was knee deep in aggressively free-speech hippies, so he was unlikely to ban anything like that. Reagan apparently enjoyed being impersonated. So I would only have to go back and check for national laws circa 1937-1957, and at the same time keep an eye out for obscure per-state and city laws while putting together the complete timeline for the 1920-1970 period. Only at that point might I have hit search tools for online legal rulings — it would have been pointless to start with them.

Topsy

A new Twitter keyword search-engine, www.topsy.com. Pretty good at helping you find a useful little egg, amid the vast guano-splattered nest of useless fluff that is Twitter. Sadly you can’t pluck out an RSS feed for a regular search, at least in the free version.