The UK’s Radio Times listings magazine is available online from 1923 to 2009. The magazine was once the nation’s vital weekly TV and radio listings title. When last noted on the JURN blog, back in 2014, I think the new online listings had only extended as far back as the 1960s. Possibly there were also no thumbnail cover-scans back in 2014, but there are now.

You can’t actually click through to hear programmes, due to a combination of the trades unions and the surprising and very regrettable lack of tape archives. So if you do spot gems in the listings, like the 26-part radio history of The British Seafarer (1980) with music and FX by the Radiophonic Workshop… it’s gone forever.

The All-Sky Survey is extracting observation pictures from old astronomy journals and newsletters, and adding them into existing systems to make them discoverable in an easy manner.

Chronos is a new Gates Foundation website, offering a closed list of open access journals to publish in…

“Gates-funded researchers and Gates employees will use this service [to] search for journals offering open access options”

It’s non-public, and is presumably in the form of a whitelist. It’ll be interesting to see if the list becomes public at some point.

Predatory journals recruit fake editor, a new sting published by Nature. The sample in the study was a…

“pseudo-randomly select [of] 120 English-language journals that matched Szust’s expertise from each list. [JCR, DOAJ, and Beall’s List]”

The fake editor’s profile seems somewhat skewed toward the result the researchers may have been hoping for, having purported expertise in…

“the theory of science and sport, cognitive sciences and methodological bases of social sciences”.

It doesn’t seem that the proportion of the psuedo-random pick from each list was weighted, to account for the relative numbers of journals on each list which matched the editor’s profile. But since it’s been published by Nature, one has to assume that maybe the methodology was sound. The results are about what one might expect…

“40 predatory [Beall’s List] and 8 DOAJ journals appointed her as an editor … Of the 8 DOAJ journals that accepted Szust as editor, 6 remain on the directory as of March 2017.”

I note that, though perhaps it’s a co-incidence, the DOAJ has just thrown out a great many Bentham journal titles from their directory, citing ‘Suspected editorial misconduct by publisher’.

I should probably note here that Bentham has never been directly indexed in JURN, and that JURN doesn’t actively seek to directly index social studies or psychology or general education studies journals. Although some university titles in those areas will be incidentally included via general direct indexing of multi-journal OJS installations and repositories at universities. Such titles will also be included via JURN picking up article records from the DOAJ, Paperity, J-Stage and similar trusted aggregators.

Excellent, there’s going to be a dedicated public catalogue for Open Access Classics Serials, building on the outstanding work done by AWOL. Although its planners note that…

“A certain amount of iteration and even manual curation of data is likely to be necessary.”

Indeed. A vision of ‘herding cats into a library, and then asking them to sit in neat rows’ springs instantly to mind. If it were me, I’d consider skipping past the years of fiddling with trying to make/align/cajole automated inputs which are ‘library science friendly’ from over 1,500 journals — and instead go straight to the crowd and their keyboards. Via outreach to Fiverr-like $5 gig-workers, especially to needy scholars in places like Bangladesh¹ and Africa, to do the few months of manual keyboard bashing required to make such a catalogue totally comprehensive.

What would the cost of that be? Well, at $10 per manual input of data/links on 50 articles, adding AWOL’s 50,000 articles into an OJS setup… that’s a piffling $10,000 and would have a usefully-searchable catalogue done in a few months. I’m assuming an OJS installation can scale to provide a unified mirror for the TOCs/abstracts/metadata of 1,500+ journals, but perhaps Persee’s WooCommerce template system might scale better (as well as being much more elegant to look at). Then perhaps add another $5,000 for volleys of curator-directed $10 gigs to ’round up the strays’, and to get second-opinion proofreading and error-correction.

Of course, AWOL’s posts sometime list volumes alone rather than volumes + articles, so there would be a certain amount of additional build-out and extra cost beyond the initial scooping of AWOL into catalogue form. But that might not cost a great deal extra on top of the initial $15k. Even with management and web-hosting costs the v1.0 version of the catalogue could probably all be done very comprehensively for less than $30,000. A small Foundation, a Kickstarter, or even a private consortium of 60 classics professors (x $500 each) should be able to easily raise that.

1. A skilled Bangladeshi purchasing and inventory clerk, a job which seems an apt comparison for data entry, currently earns an average of around $250 U.S. per month. A Bangladeshi teacher earns about $180 per month. Assuming a carefully-done entry of data and links on 50 articles (paying $10) per day, over 28 days such work would pay a needy scholar a good local monthly wage of $280.

20,000 Worldclass University Lectures Made Illegal, So We Irrevocably Mirrored Them…

We copied all 20,000 and are making them permanently available for free via LBRY. The vast majority of the lectures are licensed under a Creative Commons license that allows attributed, non-commercial redistribution. The price for this content has been set to free …

Similarity search has been added to Flickr:

1. Make an initial keyword search inside Flickr.

2. Select a photo thumbnail, hover your mouse over it.

3. A three-dot bar will fade up in the top-right corner.

4. Click once on the three-dots and select Search for similar photos.

My test with a ginger kitten on a green background suggests that only basic parameters are being searched for. In this case “cat face with ginger fur”, rather than “cat face with ginger fur” + a green background. Nor is the search able to distinguish between grown cats and kittens, which suggests no keywords are being added to the mix.

Japan’s central ejournals aggregation and hosting website J-Stage is still down, after about five days now. Hopefully it’s not been badly hacked and can come back online soon. I’ve removed the J-Stage indexing URL from JURN until it returns, rather than send users to warning pages.