• Directory
  • FAQ: about JURN
  • Group tests
  • Guide to academic search
  • JURN’s donationware
  • Links
  • openEco: titles indexed

News from JURN

~ search tool for open access content

News from JURN

Category Archives: Open Access publishing

The arts issue

18 Saturday Jul 2009

Posted by futurilla in Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

Daniel Seidell on the curse of the special ‘arts issue’.

AJOL

13 Monday Jul 2009

Posted by futurilla in Economics of Open Access, Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

A lengthy and referenced overview, based on a recent 2009 conference presentation, of the African Journal Online service — with some statistics. AJOL seems to be building quite an empire among African journals, and it has over 300 titles with about 28 of those in the arts and humanities.

Open Monograph Press launches 8th–10th July

26 Friday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Open Access publishing, Spotted in the news

≈ Leave a comment

The non-profit behind the Open Journal System is about to launch a version for monographs, called the Open Monograph Press (OMP). (Background and PDFs).

Seven things any new ejournal should consider

16 Tuesday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in How to improve academic search, JURN tips and tricks, My general observations, Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

Having recently got up close and personal with thousands of ejournal URLs, here are seven suggestions for those who are considering launching an independent open ejournal in the arts and humanities.

1.   Register your own domain name. Try to make it human-readable and meaningful — e.g.: www.fabric-artists.org rather than using initials or shortened forms such as www.f-art.com. Pay for the domain and all hosted server costs up-front, for at least ten years, with a reliable commercial web hosting provider. This should not cost you more than about £600. Expensive, but it means that the university IT techies can’t capriciously juggle the root URL and thus break all your inbound links. Store all parts of the journal at your domain, calling no core content in from off-site, or from “slightly-different” URLs.

Problems solved: a) countless dead “404” links in ejournals list and directories just a few years old, and a circa 80% attrition rate on those more than five years old; b) a niche academic search-engine indexes your home page URL, but doesn’t also index the articles because you’ve stored them at a different URL.

2.   Consider using the URL and file name as a carrier for some basic metadata, including clearly indicating if the content is free or pay. For instance…

   www.technology-history.org/journal-issue-004/free-full-text/2009_adams_preindustrial_water_mills.html

Where preindustrial_water_mills are the first three words of the article title.

Without even accessing the document, a human can now glance at the URL in search results and read off:

   Journal name (Technology History)
   Issue number (Number 4)
   It’s from a journal
   It’s free full-text
   The year published (2009)
   The author surname (Adams)
   The first three words of the article title (“preindustrial water mills“)

As you can see, that’s much more useful than having something impenetrable such as:   www.hupt.stetford.edu/caij/admin/contentimages/38-02-106_h894.html   and far better than having a huge database-driven scripted URL. You’ll exclude common words such as ‘the’ from the article title, obviously.

Problems solved: a) a useful range of basic metadata is not automatically displayed alongside a link to the journal article, other than the title (if you’re lucky) and an often-misleading text snippet; b) users accessing via a standard public search-engine have to download and manually open your article file to find out simple things like when it was published and if it’s really free full-text.

3.   Don’t hang admin pages directly off the main URL. Put them in their own folder, e.g.: www.full-journal-name.org/editorial-files/our_editorial_board.html

Problem solved: Indexing the main domain also brings in all sorts of administrative fluff, old conference flyers, etc

4.   Publish in HTML, as well as in PDF.

Problem solved: PDF is print-oriented (so consider linking each issue to a POD book publisher such as Lulu), but with HTML people can do more interesting things with (like browser addons that auto-detect and auto-link citations on a page)

5.   Make sure all your articles contain basic information like: the journal title, issue number, and ideally your home-page URL in clickable form. Put this in the body text of the article. Also make sure your PDF file properties are all filled out correctly, as are your HTML headers. It’s just basic marketing really, but also useful for those who would organise knowledge.

Problem solved: A downloaded article from an open access ejournal very often has no embedded data giving the full journal title and issue number. Future generations won’t thank a researcher for telling them, “um yeah, but I once had that stuff via my personal copy of Zotero”.

6.   Zero tolerance for broken URLs and 404 errors. Never ever let your IT techies or web designers change your directory structure once it’s set. If they really have to for some world-shattering technical reason, then make sure you force them to set up durable (five-year minimum) working redirects for every article, or use some server magic to make the new structure look like the old structure to the outside world.

Problems solved: a) too many dead “404” links in ejournals directories just a few years old; b) blogs, discussion forums have many broken direct links to journal articles they’re discussing; c) there are even sometimes broken links on the journal website itself(!) caused by directory-juggling.

7.   Publicise. There’s nothing more disheartening than doing a Google search for link:www.your-established-ejournal.org — and finding that the only people who link to it are your university and a lone blog post from 2006. Being a journal on an obscure topic doesn’t mean you should be invisible. Google will bury you if you don’t have any inbound links, and (I would imagine) your authors may drift away if no-one links to or reads their articles. There’s also a whole planet out there, and the next expert in hyperkinetic light-art might be a kid sitting in a bush college in Uganda. She needs to find your excellent new article giving an overview of hyperkinetic light-art.

A Manifesto for Scholarly Publishing

15 Monday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

“A Manifesto for Scholarly Publishing”, over at the U.S. Chronicle of Higher Education (12th Jun 09)…

“the first key to a stronger and more vital university press is in the embrace of a broader array of fields, notably the professions, including medicine; engineering; computer, environmental, information, and management sciences; graphic design; and finance. [ all of which ] are often seen as peripheral to the humanities-centered core mission of universities, and to the heavily humanities-oriented program of university presses.”

“While naysayers may argue that publishing more books on the professions subverts the university press’s historical commitment to the humanities and culture, one could counter that those professional fields are themselves coming to define culture. Think of the growing influence on society of fields such as telecommunications, financial engineering, and cognitive science, as well as the increasingly ubiquitous influence of statistics and applied mathematics in everyday communications.”

Workload allowances for journal editing

13 Saturday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Economics of Open Access, Open Access publishing

≈ 1 Comment

An interesting point from the publisher of an independent commercial academic journal…

The [ universities and their various Research Assessment Exercises ] have created, and they sustain, an academic assessment system that is very heavily dependent on academic journals, but which gives no credit whatever for the editing of such journals. The universities offer precious little encouragement (read “no material support” and “no workload allowance”) for the editing or publication of academic journals.

Publishing art books

03 Wednesday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

The managing director of Thames & Hudson gives a clear overview, in The Art Newspaper of some of the problems in the contemporary publishing of art books. It seems a sound article, but I’d like to pick up a couple of points.

He writes that the…

“preoccupation with low prices has had the pernicious effect of devaluing books in the minds of consumers”

…but seems to imply that Amazon is mainly to blame. He doesn’t mention the effect of near slave-labour printing in the Far East, as a factor that has allegedly allowed publishers to drop prices for huge coffee-table tomes that might have otherwise retailed at twice the price.

He also mentions in passing (and might have said more about) another trend that is, in a different way, “devaluing books in the minds of consumers” — the journalistic hunger to sniff at the dirty-linen drawer of dead artists and thus to…

“appropriate art for contemporary society’s great mass-market fuel: celebrity”

Undesirables

01 Monday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Academic search, Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

A new article at the German Goethe-Institut website…

“The ‘universal’ library of the American search engine company Google, on the other hand, has no primary significance for the desirable exchange of scientific and scholarly information”

/Cough/

A casual search turns up what sounds like something of a rebuttal: “Google Scholar versus PubMed in Locating Primary Literature to Answer Drug-Related Questions” (March 2009)…

“No significant differences were identified in the number of target primary literature articles located between databases. PubMed searches yielded fewer total citations than Google Scholar results…”

And another: “Google Scholar Search Performance: Comparative Recall and Precision” (January 2009)…

“a comparative evaluation of Google Scholar and 11 other bibliographic databases (Academic Search Elite, AgeLine, ArticleFirst, EconLit, GEOBASE, MEDLINE, PAIS International, POPLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, and SocINDEX), focusing on search performance within the multidisciplinary field of later-life migration. The results of simple keyword searches are evaluated with reference to a set of 155 relevant articles identified in advance. In terms of both recall and precision, Google Scholar performs better than most of the subscription databases. This finding, based on a rigorous evaluation procedure…”

And of course this recent article, which I blogged a few days ago: “How Scholarly is Google Scholar? A Comparison to Library Databases” (PDF pre-print paper for College & Research Libraries journal, accepted 30th June 2008)…

“We found that Google Scholar is, on average, 17.6% more scholarly than materials found only in library databases and that there is no statistically significant difference between the scholarliness of materials found in Google Scholar across disciplines.”

eJournal 2.0

30 Saturday May 2009

Posted by futurilla in New media journal articles, Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

“Academia 2.0: What Would a Fully Interactive Journal Article Look Like?”…

“We wrapped up the paper yesterday and it got me thinking about what a fully interactive version of the paper would look like. What if all the maps and charts were embeds? What if you could download all the data sets used for the analysis right from the paper? While many journal have come online and some even in openly accessible venues – I don’t think we’ve really tapped the power of the Web for interactivity, data sharing, innovation, or peer review.”

The full article, on “Geospatial Modeling of Supply Shocks”, is included in the post…

“Opening up the commenting and feedback process could foster even better critique of work. By also making data available, an incentive is created for fellow researchers to interact with the research, provide feedback, and collaborate with authors. Potentially you could create a journal in such a format leveraging interactive tools across the web. To give this idea a go I’ve created an example of what such an article could look like with our oil paper as the guinea pig”

Newer posts →
RSS Feed: Subscribe

 

Please become my patron at www.patreon.com/davehaden to help JURN survive and thrive.

JURN

  • JURN : directory of ejournals
  • JURN : main search-engine
  • JURN : openEco directory
  • JURN : repository search
  • Categories

    • Academic search
    • Ecology additions
    • Economics of Open Access
    • How to improve academic search
    • JURN blogged
    • JURN metrics
    • JURN tips and tricks
    • JURN's Google watch
    • My general observations
    • New media journal articles
    • New titles added to JURN
    • Official and think-tank reports
    • Ooops!
    • Open Access publishing
    • Spotted in the news
    • Uncategorized

    Archives

    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • October 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009

    Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.