• Directory
  • FAQ: about JURN
  • Group tests
  • Guide to academic search
  • JURN’s donationware
  • Links
  • openEco: titles indexed

News from JURN

~ search tool for open access content

News from JURN

Monthly Archives: June 2009

Mind your language

05 Friday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Academic search, Official and think-tank reports

≈ Leave a comment

A new June 2009 position paper from the British Academy, arising from a one year study to…

“investigate the hypothesis that UK humanities and social science research was becoming increasingly insular in outlook (and even in aims)”

… due to the way in which, it is claimed, a…

“lack of [ second ] language skills inflicts a real handicap on scholars”.

Inward-looking UK funding models may also be a strong factor, although this is not mentioned. And the incredible barriers raised by European universities against British academic job-seekers.

Equally worryingly, the report talks of…

“An over-reliance on imported talent” … [ humanities and social science ] “university departments are increasingly addressing this skills shortage by buying-in the skills they need from abroad, rather than by seeking to help UK researchers and academics to ‘upskill’.”

That sounds very familiar. A very accurate observation, I’d say.

In the absence of such UK language skills, perhaps we need a Google Translate specialist ‘Humanities Scholar version’. Along with serious up-skilling on search in other languages. In China you can’t become even a junior academic, unless you pass a rigorous state test on how to use Google ‘to the max’. The test includes…

“how to use Google for automatic translation from Chinese to English or the other way round”

Google Scholar and Its Competitors

04 Thursday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Academic search

≈ Leave a comment

Due for publication in the Autumn of 2009, an interesting-sounding book called Google Scholar and Its Competitors : Accessing Scholarly Resources on the Web by Ingrid Hsieh-Yee.

Google Scholar and the Researcher

04 Thursday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Academic search

≈ Leave a comment

A new article evaluating Google Scholar (May 2009), written for those running businesses, by university librarian William Badke.

Publishing art books

03 Wednesday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

The managing director of Thames & Hudson gives a clear overview, in The Art Newspaper of some of the problems in the contemporary publishing of art books. It seems a sound article, but I’d like to pick up a couple of points.

He writes that the…

“preoccupation with low prices has had the pernicious effect of devaluing books in the minds of consumers”

…but seems to imply that Amazon is mainly to blame. He doesn’t mention the effect of near slave-labour printing in the Far East, as a factor that has allegedly allowed publishers to drop prices for huge coffee-table tomes that might have otherwise retailed at twice the price.

He also mentions in passing (and might have said more about) another trend that is, in a different way, “devaluing books in the minds of consumers” — the journalistic hunger to sniff at the dirty-linen drawer of dead artists and thus to…

“appropriate art for contemporary society’s great mass-market fuel: celebrity”

JURN blogged

02 Tuesday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in JURN blogged

≈ Leave a comment

JURN has been blogged by Digizen and Sociologia Contemporanea.

Undesirables

01 Monday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in Academic search, Open Access publishing

≈ Leave a comment

A new article at the German Goethe-Institut website…

“The ‘universal’ library of the American search engine company Google, on the other hand, has no primary significance for the desirable exchange of scientific and scholarly information”

/Cough/

A casual search turns up what sounds like something of a rebuttal: “Google Scholar versus PubMed in Locating Primary Literature to Answer Drug-Related Questions” (March 2009)…

“No significant differences were identified in the number of target primary literature articles located between databases. PubMed searches yielded fewer total citations than Google Scholar results…”

And another: “Google Scholar Search Performance: Comparative Recall and Precision” (January 2009)…

“a comparative evaluation of Google Scholar and 11 other bibliographic databases (Academic Search Elite, AgeLine, ArticleFirst, EconLit, GEOBASE, MEDLINE, PAIS International, POPLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, and SocINDEX), focusing on search performance within the multidisciplinary field of later-life migration. The results of simple keyword searches are evaluated with reference to a set of 155 relevant articles identified in advance. In terms of both recall and precision, Google Scholar performs better than most of the subscription databases. This finding, based on a rigorous evaluation procedure…”

And of course this recent article, which I blogged a few days ago: “How Scholarly is Google Scholar? A Comparison to Library Databases” (PDF pre-print paper for College & Research Libraries journal, accepted 30th June 2008)…

“We found that Google Scholar is, on average, 17.6% more scholarly than materials found only in library databases and that there is no statistically significant difference between the scholarliness of materials found in Google Scholar across disciplines.”

A weed among the shemales

01 Monday Jun 2009

Posted by futurilla in JURN metrics

≈ Leave a comment

I’ve weeded some crud from the index, a result of running a range of test searches with JURN. The following were removed:- six publication titles (spam infestation, mostly in trade and fashion magazines); ten poor-quality blogs (they’d set up shop within various journal websites); and two ‘artist directories’ (again, set up within magazine websites).

JURN — now probably the only search-engine on the planet where you can safely search for shemales, viagra and similar, and actually get useful results. Heh.

Newer posts →
RSS Feed: Subscribe

 

Please become my patron at www.patreon.com/davehaden to help JURN survive and thrive.

JURN

  • JURN : directory of ejournals
  • JURN : main search-engine
  • JURN : openEco directory
  • JURN : repository search
  • Categories

    • Academic search
    • Ecology additions
    • Economics of Open Access
    • How to improve academic search
    • JURN blogged
    • JURN metrics
    • JURN tips and tricks
    • JURN's Google watch
    • My general observations
    • New media journal articles
    • New titles added to JURN
    • Official and think-tank reports
    • Ooops!
    • Open Access publishing
    • Spotted in the news
    • Uncategorized

    Archives

    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • October 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009

    Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.