{"id":6394,"date":"2013-03-22T10:23:03","date_gmt":"2013-03-22T07:23:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=6394"},"modified":"2013-03-22T10:23:03","modified_gmt":"2013-03-22T07:23:03","slug":"new-scholarly-books-on-lovecraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2013\/03\/22\/new-scholarly-books-on-lovecraft\/","title":{"rendered":"New scholarly books on Lovecraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of forthcoming books of essays on Lovecraft, dated and with covers.<\/p>\n<p>Dated May 2013, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/Lovecraft-Influence-Predecessors-Successors-Supernatural\/dp\/0810891158\/\">Lovecraft and Influence: his predecessors and successors<\/a><\/em>.  This is a 200 page hardback in the Studies in Supernatural Literature series, from Scarecrow Press&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Chapters in this collection are devoted to authors whose work had an impact on Lovecraft &mdash; Alexander Pope, Jonathan Swift, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Edgar Allan Poe, and Lord Dunsany &mdash; and those who drew inspiration from him, including William S. Burroughs, Ramsey Campbell, Thomas Ligotti&#8221; and others.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/linf.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/linf.jpg\" alt=\"linf\" width=\"198\" height=\"295\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6395\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The first half of this sounds interesting, especially as it&#8217;s edited by Robert H. Waugh. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen a really good analysis of the influence of the 18th century writers whom Lovecraft imbibed so heavily (although possibly Joshi has one somewhere, on at least the philosophical influences).  I&#8217;d welcome a print or Kindle review-copy of this one.<\/p>\n<p>The second is due June 2013, Gavin Callaghan&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/Lovecrafts-Dark-Arcadia-Symbology-Contradiction\/dp\/0786470798\/\">H.P. Lovecraft&#8217;s Dark Arcadia: the satire, symbology and contradiction<\/a><\/em> is from the mainstream publisher McFarland&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Gavin Callaghan goes back to the weird texts themselves, and follows where Lovecraft leads him: into an arcane world of parental giganticism and inverted classicism, in which Lovecraft&#8217;s parental obsessions were twisted into the all-powerful cosmic monsters of his imaginary cosmology.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/sat.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/sat.jpg\" alt=\"sat\" width=\"198\" height=\"295\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6396\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This sounds horribly as though it may be Freudian in some form in its approach: &#8220;parental giganticism&#8221;?  Let&#8217;s hope it doesn&#8217;t also fashionably suggest little Lovecraft as the subject of unwonted attentions behind the woodshed&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of forthcoming books of essays on Lovecraft, dated and with covers. Dated May 2013, Lovecraft and Influence: his &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2013\/03\/22\/new-scholarly-books-on-lovecraft\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-books","category-scholarly-works"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}