{"id":58800,"date":"2023-03-06T03:50:28","date_gmt":"2023-03-06T03:50:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/?p=58800"},"modified":"2023-03-05T16:21:00","modified_gmt":"2023-03-05T16:21:00","slug":"deep-cuts-on-hart-crane-loveman-and-lovecraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2023\/03\/06\/deep-cuts-on-hart-crane-loveman-and-lovecraft\/","title":{"rendered":"Deep Cuts on Hart Crane, Loveman and Lovecraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/deepcuts.blog\/2023\/03\/04\/deeper-cut-hart-crane\/\">Deep Cuts<\/a><\/em> has a fine new article which takes a long look at Hart Crane, Loveman and Lovecraft, and with the benefit of being able to consult the new second edition of Loveman&#8217;s <em>Out of the Immortal Night<\/em> and a full collection of the volumes of the Lovecraft letters. A key point is only made briefly and at the end, where it might have been usefully expanded a bit and threaded through the article. To be actively gay at that time and place, even in bohemian enclaves such as Greenwich Village&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>was often not just illegal and met by violence<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230; and I would add by blackmail, ranging from a quasi-friendly &#8216;borrowing money&#8217; to outright thuggish extortion. Gay men were also targeted for such treatment. In 1931 for instance, Loveman was earning very good money (&#8220;$60.00 per week&#8221;) as a book cataloguer at Dauber &#038; Pine, and would have been a prime target for such things.<\/p>\n<p>I can add a few more relevant quotes to the <em>Deep Cuts<\/em> article, drawn from previous <em>Tentaclii<\/em> posts&#8230; <\/p>\n<p>1. The Wandrei letters, p. 132. At the Metropolitan Museum, Lovecraft recalled he&#8230; \u201crevelled in the new Wing K \u2014 the Roman garden with the statues. A certain austere head of a tight-lipped old Republican Roman is as much a favourite of mine as that effeminately pretty Antinous-type Hellenic head in the corridor is a favourite of Loveman\u2019s.\u201d Young Wandrei was then in New York with Loveman, and this seems to me a fairly clear but discreet \u2018tip off\u2019 to the lad about Loveman\u2019s amorous inclinations.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>Letters to Family &#038; Friends<\/em>, page 632. Lovecraft remarks that his friend Loveman had many young proteges&#8230; &#8220;He had with him one of his numberless prodigy-proteges, a quiet blond youth whose accomplishments seem to be, so far, appreciative rather than creative&#8221;. Again, a rather telling but discreet hint.<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>Lovecraft\u2019s New York Circle<\/em>, page 28. An item in &#8216;Kirk&#8217;s Diary&#8217;, said of a cafe table meeting of the Lovecraft Circle&#8230; &#8220;one was a homo, one an avowed fetishist, one quite nothing were sex is concerned\u201d, wrote Kirk of the unnamed participants at the table (likely a cafe table, and thus not a meet-up in McNeil&#8217;s room). I&#8217;ve established that Lovecraft can&#8217;t have been present at that precise point (he was in Elizabethtown), so presumably Loveman was &#8216;out&#8217; at least to Kirk and possibly to the other two unknown attendees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deep Cuts has a fine new article which takes a long look at Hart Crane, Loveman and Lovecraft, and with &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2023\/03\/06\/deep-cuts-on-hart-crane-loveman-and-lovecraft\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical-context"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58800"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58816,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58800\/revisions\/58816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}