{"id":48271,"date":"2021-06-08T05:31:10","date_gmt":"2021-06-08T02:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=48271"},"modified":"2021-06-08T05:31:10","modified_gmt":"2021-06-08T02:31:10","slug":"literary-lamas-of-new-york","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2021\/06\/08\/literary-lamas-of-new-york\/","title":{"rendered":"Literary Lamas of New York"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a view of Lovecraft from 1950 that escaped the <em>A Weird Writer in our Midst<\/em> collection of early Lovecraft criticism and commentary&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/lovecraft.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/lovecraft.jpg?w=529\" alt=\"\" width=\"529\" height=\"498\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-48273\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Erroneous in facts, but a valid example of what some in 1950 might have thought of Lovecraft. What was <em>Literary Lamas of New York<\/em> (1950)? Archive.org doesn&#8217;t have it, so I can&#8217;t tell if the author went on to more commentary on Lovecraft, or if it was an isolated remark. The book appears to have been a coruscation of the pre-war and wartime mistreatment of talented writers by New York City publishers.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/loudl.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/loudl.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"291\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-48380\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a view of Lovecraft from 1950 that escaped the A Weird Writer in our Midst collection of early Lovecraft &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2021\/06\/08\/literary-lamas-of-new-york\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical-context"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}