{"id":3943,"date":"2012-01-19T08:21:26","date_gmt":"2012-01-19T05:21:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=3943"},"modified":"2012-01-19T08:21:26","modified_gmt":"2012-01-19T05:21:26","slug":"intersectionality-and-lovecraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2012\/01\/19\/intersectionality-and-lovecraft\/","title":{"rendered":"Intersectionality and Lovecraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.locusmag.com\/Roundtable\/2012\/01\/roundtable-intersectionality-and-lovecraft\/\">Roundtable: Intersectionality and Lovecraft<\/a>, from a 12th Jan <em>Locus Online<\/em> roundtable.  &#8220;Intersectionality&#8221; is a feminist theory term that suggests one&#8217;s different social and cultural identities &mdash; being a woman, being lesbian, being black, being disabled, being a daughter &mdash; interact in society to form more intractable tangles of discrimination.  It has since been ported more generally into a variety of leftist academic approaches such as sociology and cultural studies, where it knocks around with subtler theories of hybridity, &#8216;fluid identity&#8217; versions of queer, and various ideas on how online identities are lived out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Roundtable: Intersectionality and Lovecraft, from a 12th Jan Locus Online roundtable. &#8220;Intersectionality&#8221; is a feminist theory term that suggests one&#8217;s &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2012\/01\/19\/intersectionality-and-lovecraft\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-unnamable"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3943\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}