{"id":36721,"date":"2020-03-30T05:01:24","date_gmt":"2020-03-30T02:01:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=36721"},"modified":"2022-04-24T22:16:43","modified_gmt":"2022-04-24T22:16:43","slug":"literary-influences-of-robert-e-howard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2020\/03\/30\/literary-influences-of-robert-e-howard\/","title":{"rendered":"Literary Influences of Robert E. Howard"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Todd B. Vick has just launched a new blog series, <a href=\"https:\/\/onanunderwood5.blogspot.com\/2020\/03\/the-literary-influences-of-robert-e.html\">&#8220;The Literary Influences of Robert E. Howard&#8221;<\/a>, with the increasingly forgotten James Branch Cabell as the opener.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In his review, Howard calls Cabell the ablest writer of the present age. Along with many other readers back then, Howard was seized by Cabell\u2019s command of the English language.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/james-branch-cabell-1935.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/james-branch-cabell-1935.jpg?w=529\" alt=\"\" width=\"529\" height=\"667\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-36723\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Carl van Vechten&#8217;s portrait of Cabell, 1935. B&amp;W from the Library of Congress, but here newly up-rezzed, tweaked and colourised by me. View on a dark background and good monitor, to see the wooden cane in the lower half.  Feel free to use for worthy projects.<\/p>\n<p><em>DMR<\/em> also recently had a short post <a href=\"https:\/\/dmrbooks.com\/test-blog\/2019\/4\/17\/forefathers-of-sword-and-sorcery-james-branch-cabell\">Forefathers of Sword and Sorcery: James Branch Cabell<\/a> which noted others influenced by Cabell&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Neil Gaiman counts JBC as his favorite author.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Lovecraft-Barlow letters also reveal that Cabell was a key idol for Barlow.  The Lovecraft-Bloch letters also indicate Bloch was an admirer, though perhaps less ardently that Barlow.<\/p>\n<p>What of Lovecraft? He was more tepid. In 1920 he called Cabell a &#8220;real thinker&#8221;. But while judging most of Cabell&#8217;s fiction &#8220;sound and admirable&#8221;, and often with an enjoyable &#8220;light, witty, &amp; sophisticated manner&#8221; and a fine ear for &#8220;prose rhythm&#8221;, for fantasy Lovecraft very much preferred Dunsany for his &#8220;genuine magic &amp; freshness&#8221;.  <\/p>\n<p>He was distinctly sniffy about the politics, though, by 1935. To Bloch he wrote&#8230; &#8220;Cabell strikes me as a pale-pink Anatole France &mdash; with a lot less to say than his prototype had&#8221;. Pale-pink here seems to refer to Cabell&#8217;s politics. If one was &#8216;pink&#8217; in the mid 1930s, one was a dupe or a fellow-traveller of the &#8216;reds&#8217; (the Communist Party). Such people failed to know or recall that when &#8216;the revolution&#8217; is in its early stages the intellectual comrade &mdash; the bookish guy with intellectual theories and a taste for poetry &mdash; is the one put up against the wall and shot by the thuggish element among his comrades. Still, even in a letter to Bloch of November 1935 Lovecraft can still be found lauding Cabell and overlooking his political foolishness. In this letter Lovecraft remarked that Cabell had&#8230; &#8220;one of the finest and maturest styles yet found in American prose&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Todd B. Vick has just launched a new blog series, &#8220;The Literary Influences of Robert E. Howard&#8221;, with the increasingly &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2020\/03\/30\/literary-influences-of-robert-e-howard\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical-context","category-odd-scratchings","category-reh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36721"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36721\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53835,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36721\/revisions\/53835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}