{"id":21618,"date":"2019-01-03T06:05:17","date_gmt":"2019-01-03T03:05:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=21618"},"modified":"2019-01-03T06:05:17","modified_gmt":"2019-01-03T03:05:17","slug":"the-dealings-of-daniel-kesserich","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2019\/01\/03\/the-dealings-of-daniel-kesserich\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dealings of Daniel Kesserich"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New to me, <em>The Dealings of Daniel Kesserich<\/em> by Fritz Leiber.  It&#8217;s of interest for being an early strongly Lovecraft-influenced tale of substantial length, and for being left out of the book <em><a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/2RoFbkN\">Fritz Leiber and H.P. Lovecraft: Writers of the Dark<\/a><\/em>.  Apparently the setting is the California of the small desert towns.  It was drafted by a young raw Fritz Leiber in 1936, under the influence of Lovecraft.  <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/dealings.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/dealings.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"314\" height=\"475\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-21619\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no mention of it in Joshi&#8217;s survey book <em>Rise and Fall of the Cthulhu Mythos<\/em>, and Joshi remarks elsewhere that it &#8220;it is not to be considered a &#8216;Lovecraftian&#8217; story&#8221; even though it does include Lovecraft&#8217;s &#8220;style and trademark concepts&#8221; &mdash; which makes it sound even more interesting than a simple Mythos monster romper-stomper.  Early attempts by major writers at Lovecraft&#8217;s <em>style<\/em> and themes are always of interest here at <em>Tentaclii<\/em> and I&#8217;m pleased to find a substantial non-Derleth one that I was previously unaware of. There&#8217;s more&#8230; the <em>Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction Literature<\/em> also terms it &#8220;a Wellsian romance&#8221;, and <em>Supernatural Fiction Writers<\/em> calls it &#8220;clearly influenced by H. G. Wells&#8221; &mdash; which again appeals due to my interest in Wells&#8217;s <em>The Time Machine<\/em>. Definitely one for my reading pile, and it&#8217;s short enough to pick up when in the mood and to get through fairly quickly. <\/p>\n<p>Presumably Lovecraft was sent a carbon of the draft of <em>Dealings of Daniel Kesserich<\/em>?   Joshi writes of&#8230; &#8220;Fritz Leiber, who had shown some of his first attempts at sword-and-sorcery to his correspondent H. P. Lovecraft&#8221; so it might be fairly safe to assume he could have also sent the draft of &#8220;Daniel Kesserich&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Later the tale was revised and pitched at the pulp magazine <em>Unknown Worlds<\/em>. Presumably it was then rejected or held, or sent back for revision, since it was filed and lost for around 50 years.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no audiobook or ebook.  A free &#8220;to borrow&#8221; copy is available <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/dealingsofdaniel00leib\">on Archive.org<\/a>, and I see that <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/2Skez1h\">the slim hardback edition<\/a> is currently available at a fairly modest price on Amazon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New to me, The Dealings of Daniel Kesserich by Fritz Leiber. It&#8217;s of interest for being an early strongly Lovecraft-influenced &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2019\/01\/03\/the-dealings-of-daniel-kesserich\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical-context","category-new-books"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}