{"id":21332,"date":"2018-12-18T00:19:43","date_gmt":"2018-12-17T21:19:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=21332"},"modified":"2018-12-18T00:19:43","modified_gmt":"2018-12-17T21:19:43","slug":"the-lightning-scarred-lovecraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2018\/12\/18\/the-lightning-scarred-lovecraft\/","title":{"rendered":"The &#8220;lightning-scarred&#8221; Lovecraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t bother with the likes of Twitter, but I occasionally use Social Searcher to take a fleeting keyword-based glance across the cesspool. Very rarely does anything newsworthy turn up among the parroting and blather. But today I noticed that a Twitter-diot is complaining about Lovecraft making up items such as &#8220;lightning-scarred&#8221; in &#8220;The Lurking Fear&#8221;.  Yet a simple search of Google Books, Google Scholar and Hathi swiftly reveals many such uses&#8230; <\/p>\n<p>* The U.S. Congress&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>These lightning-scarred trees are readily found in any large body of timber. During the dry season of 1910 there were many electrical storms, and innumerable small fires were found immediately afterwards.&#8221; (1910)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>* The U.S Bureau of Mines&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Lightning, however, sometimes strikes an airship without destroying it. The Friedrichshafen Museum has lightning-scarred parts of airships that have withstood thunderstorms successfully (1933)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>* It appears to have been &#8216;house standard&#8217; usage in <em>American Forestry<\/em> journal, and elsewhere in forestry publications and articles. One can find it, for instance in the pre-war publications of the ranger stations at Yosemite and the Grand Canyon.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, while one <em>can<\/em> find it getting past the picky copy-editors of <em>The New England Magazine<\/em> in 1909 (&#8220;the lightning-scarred beech tree by the mill in the hollow&#8221;) and <em>The Saturday Evening Post<\/em> in 1919 (&#8220;He had seen living trees struck and had examined the lightning-scarred tops of fallen dead ones&#8221;), and it <em>does<\/em> occurs in the poetry of Aubrey De Vere and the 1910 translation of <em>The Aeneid of Virgil<\/em> (&#8220;[his] body lightning-scarred, Lies prisoned under all, so runs the tale&#8221;), Lovecraft does not seem to have been reflecting very much of a literary usage.  For instance, there&#8217;s nothing in the obvious suspects such as Poe or Melville&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.melville.org\/lrman.htm\">&#8220;The Lightning-Rod Man&#8221;<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>It seems more probable that Lovecraft had noticed the then-current forestry usage, and I assume that was because he had perused a few journals for research before he wrote &#8220;The Lurking Fear&#8221; and made a working list of the correct terminology. He would also have been looking for books on mountain lightning and thunder-storms. See my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/free-stuff\/\">annotated &#8220;Lurking Fear&#8221;<\/a> for details on the extent of Lovecraft&#8217;s accurate knowledge of the Catskill Mountains.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t bother with the likes of Twitter, but I occasionally use Social Searcher to take a fleeting keyword-based glance &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2018\/12\/18\/the-lightning-scarred-lovecraft\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historical-context"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21332"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21332\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}