{"id":17316,"date":"2018-09-23T11:03:29","date_gmt":"2018-09-23T08:03:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tentaclii.wordpress.com\/?p=17316"},"modified":"2018-09-23T11:03:29","modified_gmt":"2018-09-23T08:03:29","slug":"shadows-over-baker-street-the-worthy-stories","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2018\/09\/23\/shadows-over-baker-street-the-worthy-stories\/","title":{"rendered":"Shadows Over Baker Street &#8211; the worthy stories"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which stories might I want to read in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/2Nws3ZJ\">Shadows Over Baker Street<\/a><\/em>, the well-known Sherlock Holmes-Lovecraft mash-up anthology?  I rarely glance at such anthologies and, even when I do, I&#8217;m not someone who slogs through all stories. Roll on the day we get &#8216;the Spotify for stories&#8217; and can do our own remix anthologies.  In the meantime I just want the best in any given anthology or collection, and am prepared to do 30 minutes of research to find out which stories are deemed the best.<\/p>\n<p>Nor do I care for &#8216;sidelong stories&#8217;, of the sort that often pad anthologies by strapping a minor character into some tangentially connected setting. For instance, <em>Shadows Over Baker Street<\/em> has a reportedly good story featuring Sebastian Moran on a tiger-hunt in India.  But neither the setting or the minor character appeals to me.  I don&#8217;t read Sherlock Holmes stories for their jungle settings.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/tales.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"498\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-17317\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s see what the reviews say about the book:&mdash;<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bakerstreetdozen.com\/shadowsbs.html\">Baker St. Dozen<\/a><\/strong> has a biting review from a sceptical Sherlockian perspective. They only strongly commend the following stories, which use the expected setting and approach:<\/p>\n<p>* Steven Elliott-Altman, &#8220;A Case of Royal Blood&#8221;.<br \/>\n* Brian Stableford, &#8220;Art in the Blood&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kirkusreviews.com\/book-reviews\/michael-reaves\/shadows-over-baker-street\/\">Kirkus<\/a><\/strong> has its usual snippy review, though this one is less cutting than usual. They note:<\/p>\n<p>* Neil Gaiman, &#8220;A Study in Emerald&#8221;.<br \/>\n* Brian Stableford, \u201cArt in the Blood\u201d.<br \/>\n* F. Gwynplaine McIntyre, &#8220;The Adventure of Exham Priory\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The latter is singled out by Kirkus as a &#8220;stunning&#8221; and &#8220;ingenious reworking of the familiar incident of Holmes\u2019s misadventure at the Reichenbach Falls&#8221;.  An Amazon review also claims it to be darkly comic, if one reads it in the right way.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/theharrow.com\/The%20Harrow\/www.theharrow.com\/columns\/reviews\/bakerstreet.html\">The Harrow Review<\/a><\/strong> has:<\/p>\n<p>* Neil Gaiman, &#8220;A Study in Emerald&#8221;.<br \/>\n* Steven-Elliot Altman, \u201cA Case of Royal Blood\u201d.<br \/>\n* James Lowder, &#8220;The Weeping Masks&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.innsmouthfreepress.com\/blog\/review-shadows-over-baker-street\/\">Innsmouth Free Press<\/a><\/strong> singled out:<\/p>\n<p>* Neil Gaiman, &#8220;A Study in Emerald&#8221;.<br \/>\n* F. Gwynplaine McIntyre, &#8220;The Adventure of Exham Priory\u201d.  <\/p>\n<p>Note that several of the more fannish reviewers, who I also consulted, also disliked Neil Gaiman&#8217;s &#8220;A Study in Emerald&#8221;. Apparently for its too-whimsical approach. You either love it or hate it, it seems. My own reaction to it takes the form of a short Holmes pastiche story <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/summerschool2011-purloinedprose.pdf\">&#8220;The Case of the Purloined Prose&#8221;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I then skittered over the Amazon reviews, but failed to spot claims for as-yet un-noticed gems in the collection. F. Gwynplaine Macintyre&#8217;s &#8220;The Adventure of Exham Priory&#8221; did have another bit of acclaim in one such review.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Thus, for those who don&#8217;t want to slog through all 480 pages of what is widely regarded as a very patchy collection, <em>Shadows Over Baker Street<\/em> appears to boil down to&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* Neil Gaiman, &#8220;A Study in Emerald&#8221;.<br \/>\n* Steven-Elliot Altman, \u201cA Case of Royal Blood\u201d.<br \/>\n* Brian Stableford, &#8220;Art in the Blood&#8221;.<br \/>\n* James Lowder, &#8220;The Weeping Masks&#8221;.<br \/>\n* F. Gwynplaine McIntyre, &#8220;The Adventure of Exham Priory\u201d.<br \/>\n* Simon Clarke&#8217;s &#8220;Nightmare in Wax&#8221; &#8211; this ends the volume, and does get occasional tepid mentions in the reviews.<\/p>\n<p>Only half a dozen. Still, the book is now <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/2Nws3ZJ\">on Kindle for just 99 pence<\/a> (about $1.30). Even just for a handful of such crossover stories, that&#8217;s not a bad price.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Finally, talking of Cthulhu and Sherlock, avoid <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurn.link\/tentaclii\/oldimages\/avoid.jpg\">this new book series<\/a> like the plague. Great covers, but bloody awful books from both a Lovecraftian and Sherlockian perspective.  And just plain bad writing too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which stories might I want to read in Shadows Over Baker Street, the well-known Sherlock Holmes-Lovecraft mash-up anthology? I rarely &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/2018\/09\/23\/shadows-over-baker-street-the-worthy-stories\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lovecraftian-arts","category-new-books"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17316\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/tentaclii\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}