{"id":3745,"date":"2017-09-10T07:40:50","date_gmt":"2017-09-10T06:40:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/potbanks.wordpress.com\/?p=3745"},"modified":"2017-09-10T07:40:50","modified_gmt":"2017-09-10T06:40:50","slug":"search-recommendations-still-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/2017\/09\/10\/search-recommendations-still-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"Search recommendations &#8211; still horribly bad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Search on eBay for &#8220;Sudbury Hall&#8221; in collectables, as a phrase.  It&#8217;s the National Trust Museum of Childhood, some 12 miles east of Stoke-on-Trent on the Staffordshire \/ Derbyshire border. <\/p>\n<p>eBay&#8217;s &#8216;Recommendations&#8217;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurnsearch.files.wordpress.com\/2017\/09\/sudbury.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jurnsearch.files.wordpress.com\/2017\/09\/sudbury.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"173\" height=\"813\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-19805\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>What a load of rubbish. So much for the much-hyped advanced in semantic search capabilities and sophisticated tailoring of search to user data. <\/p>\n<p>This is on eBay, but it&#8217;s just as bad on Amazon.  And Pinterest.  Search Pinterest for <em>staffordshire postcard -dog<\/em> and get&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/oldimages\/dogs.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/oldimages\/dogs.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"270\" height=\"402\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3768\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>But I just told Pinterest (<em>-dog<\/em> mean no posts which mention the word dog) I didn&#8217;t want any dogs, so why the hell is Pinterest still recommending dog stuff to me?  Grrr.<\/p>\n<p>Search recommendation systems are obviously running on pathetically broad and isolated keywords. It&#8217;s even infecting pure search. For instance, Google Images seems to be rapidly becoming so fuzzy in the relevancy ranking of its results as to be unusable. Why can&#8217;t huge billion-dollar world-leading tech companies get this right? <\/p>\n<p>A proper system for eBay might be something along the lines of:<\/p>\n<p><font size=\"-1\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;User is logged in &#8211; yes.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Where is the user known to be based? UK, Midlands.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Is the search phrase a recognised placename &#8211; yes.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Compare current search phrase to user&#8217;s search history. For this type of search the user is expecting results from Staffordshire, Derbyshire, Cheshire.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Does the place name geo-match with the user&#8217;s search history and known location &#8211; yes.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Therefore &#8211; cluster all sidebar recommendations on the UK Midlands, and exclude listings from all other UK areas.<br \/>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Then filter Midlands suggestions so that they only show &#8216;known place&#8217; items + cluster within a fifteen mile radius of &#8220;Sudbury Hall&#8221;.<br \/>\n<\/font><\/p>\n<p>How difficult can it be?  And how much would user-goodwill and profits be boosted, when they stop showing totally irrelevant suggestions?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Search on eBay for &#8220;Sudbury Hall&#8221; in collectables, as a phrase. It&#8217;s the National Trust Museum of Childhood, some 12 miles east of Stoke-on-Trent on the Staffordshire \/ Derbyshire border. eBay&#8217;s &#8216;Recommendations&#8217;&#8230; What a load of rubbish. So much for the much-hyped advanced in semantic search capabilities and sophisticated tailoring of search to user data. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/spyders\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}