{"id":8290,"date":"2013-04-14T10:12:25","date_gmt":"2013-04-14T10:12:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=8290"},"modified":"2013-04-14T10:12:25","modified_gmt":"2013-04-14T10:12:25","slug":"humanities-ebooks-and-librarians","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2013\/04\/14\/humanities-ebooks-and-librarians\/","title":{"rendered":"Humanities ebooks and librarians"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/humanitiesebook.org\/help\/heb-whitepaper-4.html\">&#8220;Perception Analysis of Scholarly E-Books in the Humanities at the Collegiate Level&#8221;<\/a> (March 2013)&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* There does not seem to be a consensus among academic librarians regarding what is desirable in terms of humanities book offerings.<\/p>\n<p>* Many librarians do not distinguish scholarly titles from academic titles. Librarians seem to lean toward known brands (e.g., EBSCO, JSTOR), irrespective of the content that these aggregators offer.<\/p>\n<p>* Most libraries are still in the early stages of developing an e-book strategy, and many are unsure of which direction they should take.<\/p>\n<p>* &#8230;there is no agreement amongst librarians as to which humanities content is considered necessary, which collections are essential, which aggregators to use or what fields to cover<\/p>\n<p>* Most librarians surveyed believe that the various aggregators and publishers all offer the same (overlapping) content<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That last one is pretty amazing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Perception Analysis of Scholarly E-Books in the Humanities at the Collegiate Level&#8221; (March 2013)&#8230; * There does not seem to &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2013\/04\/14\/humanities-ebooks-and-librarians\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-official-and-think-tank-reports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}