{"id":4576,"date":"2009-12-23T05:56:55","date_gmt":"2009-12-23T05:56:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=4576"},"modified":"2009-12-23T05:56:55","modified_gmt":"2009-12-23T05:56:55","slug":"studies-on-access-a-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2009\/12\/23\/studies-on-access-a-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Studies on access: a review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0912.3953\">Studies on access: a review<\/a>&#8221; by Philip M. Davis (20th Dec 2009) is a&#8230; &#8220;review of the empirical literature on access to scholarly information. This review focuses on surveys of authors, article download and citation analysis&#8221;.  From the conclusion&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is a dearth of research on whether free access to the scientific literature is making a difference in non-research contexts, such as in teaching, medical practice, industry and government policy making.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[ Hat-tip: <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.earlham.edu\/~peters\/fos\/fosblog.html\" title=\"Peter Suber, Open Access News\">Open Access News<\/a><\/em> ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Studies on access: a review&#8221; by Philip M. Davis (20th Dec 2009) is a&#8230; &#8220;review of the empirical literature on &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2009\/12\/23\/studies-on-access-a-review\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,13,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academic-search","category-official-and-think-tank-reports","category-spotted-in-the-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}