{"id":2893,"date":"2009-07-20T18:45:17","date_gmt":"2009-07-20T18:45:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=2893"},"modified":"2009-07-20T18:45:17","modified_gmt":"2009-07-20T18:45:17","slug":"publishing-a-humanities-article-costs-three-times-as-much-as-a-science-article","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2009\/07\/20\/publishing-a-humanities-article-costs-three-times-as-much-as-a-science-article\/","title":{"rendered":"Publishing a humanities article costs three times as much as a science article"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This seems to be an important bit of research. The U.S. <em>Chronicle of Higher Education<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/temp\/email2.php?id=c45kpZkrZH3KhHdqDgSffByj48QjS5bT\">reports on new NHA research<\/a> which finds that&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;It costs more than three times as much to publish an article in a humanities or social-science journal as it does to publish one in a science, technical, or medical, or STM, journal [ <em>reports<\/em> ] an in-depth study of eight flagship journals in the humanities and social sciences.&#8221; [&#8230;] &#8220;It cost an average of $9,994 in 2007 to publish an article in one of the eight journals analyzed&#8221; [&#8230;] first-copy costs &mdash; &#8220;collecting, reviewing, editing, and developing content&#8221; &mdash; added up to about 47 per cent of the total outlay among the eight journals studied<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nhalliance.org\/research\/humanities-indicators\/index.shtml\">National Humanities Alliance<\/a> report <em>The Future of Scholarly Journals Publishing Among Social Science and Humanities Associations<\/em> (not yet online) was written during 2007-2009, and examined  U.S. data from 2005 to 2007.  The <em>Chronicle<\/em> journalist highlights three possible reasons for the difference&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>*<\/strong> articles are significantly longer than in the sciences<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>*<\/strong> acceptance rates are far lower than in the sciences, at a pitiful 11%<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>*<\/strong> such journals include a wider variety of content than in the sciences&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;peer-reviewed research made up about 62 percent of what the eight journals published in 2007. The remaining 38 percent consisted of &#8220;other scholarly content,&#8221; including book reviews.&#8221; [&#8230;] Such material does not come cheap, though; it must still be commissioned, edited, and put into production. It cost an [<em>annual<\/em>] average of $313,612 per journal in 2007, the study found.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On the &#8220;articles are longer&#8221; argument, I&#8217;m not sure that a simple word-count is a valid measure.  Science articles are full of complex tables, formulae, diagrams, and it must take quite some time for a reviewer to mull these over.  Similarly, I&#8217;m thinking that the acceptance rate may be so low because only the &#8220;top eight&#8221; most prestigious journals were surveyed &mdash; lesser journals may well have a far higher acceptance rate?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This seems to be an important bit of research. The U.S. Chronicle of Higher Education reports on new NHA research &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2009\/07\/20\/publishing-a-humanities-article-costs-three-times-as-much-as-a-science-article\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,13,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics-of-open-access","category-official-and-think-tank-reports","category-spotted-in-the-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}