{"id":22460,"date":"2019-04-18T19:52:18","date_gmt":"2019-04-18T18:52:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=22460"},"modified":"2019-04-18T19:52:18","modified_gmt":"2019-04-18T18:52:18","slug":"the-search-engine-map-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2019\/04\/18\/the-search-engine-map-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"The Search Engine Map (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New from independent search-engine Mojeek, <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mojeek.com\/2019\/03\/the-search-engine-map.html\">The Search Engine Map<\/a>.  All the general search engines at 2019, and where they get their results from.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.searchenginemap.com\/\">Very useful<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2019\/04\/map.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2019\/04\/map.jpg?w=529\" alt=\"\" width=\"529\" height=\"291\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-22462\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Some of my observations, on spending an hour with the map and doing some tests:<\/p>\n<p>* I see that <strong>Yippy<\/strong> is Bing, only with what is claimed to be a boost given to small and useful and hobbyist sites. And\/or a slight suppression of the megasites.  Well, it certainly improves Bing, from what I&#8217;ve seen of it so far (a week&#8217;s testing) looking for answers to techie queries in forums. Either that or Bing Search has improved since I last tested it. Even so the main problem is simply Bing&#8217;s lack of reach, when compared to the size and scope of Google.  Key sites which Google puts as the No. 1 result <em>are not even indexed<\/em> in Bing.<\/p>\n<p>* Chinese search-engine <strong>Baidu<\/strong> is missing from the map, although it is mentioned in the page.  It is sort-of possible to search <a href=\"http:\/\/www.baiduinenglish.com\/\">Baidu In English<\/a>, but according to a 2011 Reuters report it&#8217;s just Bing, perhaps with (by now) some extra Chinese-language site indexing.  I can&#8217;t find any announcement that Bing is no longer their main search supplier in 2019.<\/p>\n<p>* Interesting to see that <strong>Jive<\/strong> is a Yandex clone, but with privacy apparently baked in. It&#8217;s new to me.  Jive&#8217;s privacy aspect might make it useful if you&#8217;re paranoid about Putin.  It&#8217;s also slightly faster than Yandex, and is uncensored like Yandex.  The latter point is evidently not the case with DuckDuckGo, even though the Duck draws results partially from Yandex. (<em>Update: May 2020, Jive appears to be dead<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>* You are definitely not getting &#8220;the full Google&#8221; with <strong>Startpage.com<\/strong>, but rather results from a cut-down index. After using it for some time I&#8217;m now starting to realise how bad it is, in that respect.<\/p>\n<p>* <strong>Dogpile<\/strong> is definitely Bing, despite the claim of multiple blended results.<\/p>\n<p>* <strong>searx.me<\/strong> sounded good initially (a blend of Bing and Google), but on testing it was immediately apparent that Google doesn&#8217;t like them.  I vaguely seem to recall that this was also the case a few years back&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2019\/04\/googlecrash.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2019\/04\/googlecrash.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"376\" height=\"88\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22461\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Update: still dead at November 2019.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>* <strong>eTools.ch<\/strong> is a nice blended search-engine, but I see no Google results in any tests. Its &#8216;News&#8217; tab is also just Bing News, and without the up-to-the-minute timeliness (sorting by &#8216;last day&#8217; seems useless).  Had it been a blend of Google News + Bing News with a fine-grained &#8216;sort by date&#8217; that showed the last 30 minutes, that would have been superb.  But it&#8217;s not.  <\/p>\n<p>* <strong>Mojeek <\/strong>itself. Interesting that it&#8217;s not Google, Bing or Yandex, and thus offers an absolute fallback. But it&#8217;s not good on general searches, and seems to have a whole lot of old dead sites in its index (e.g. JISC&#8217;s circa-2013 opendoar.ooz.cottagelabs.com). Seems to be a little better the more specific you get.  Doesn&#8217;t work with Google Hit Hider (while Yandex \/ StartPage \/ DuckDuckGo do).   Despite their &#8216;News&#8217; link not being clickable when search results are being displayed, a current &#8216;News&#8217; section is accessible <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mojeek.com\/news\">from the Home Page<\/a>. However, on testing this is revealed as more of a newspaper format &mdash; and this is searchable only with the very broadest single keywords, and topical ones at that. <\/p>\n<p>* There&#8217;s still no one-box way to search <strong>Common Crawl<\/strong>.  I would have thought at least one of the Map&#8217;s engines would have plugged it into the mix, by now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New from independent search-engine Mojeek, The Search Engine Map. All the general search engines at 2019, and where they get &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2019\/04\/18\/the-search-engine-map-2019\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-spotted-in-the-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22460\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}