{"id":16851,"date":"2016-03-24T19:45:50","date_gmt":"2016-03-24T18:45:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=16851"},"modified":"2016-03-24T19:45:50","modified_gmt":"2016-03-24T18:45:50","slug":"how-readers-discover-content-in-scholarly-publications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2016\/03\/24\/how-readers-discover-content-in-scholarly-publications\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A major new consultancy report, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.simoningerconsulting.com\/nar\/how_readers_discover.html\">&#8220;How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications&#8221;<\/a> (March 2016)&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;&#8230; people working in the Government, Corporate and Charity sectors think Google is the most important discovery resource for books.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This sentiment would have been rather more pronounced, if the Google respondees had been bundled with those who favoured Google Books.<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;&#8230; people working in Humanities and Religion &amp; Theology prefer to use Google [rather than Google Scholar, to find articles]&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;&#8230; people in Humanities are much less likely to use ToC alerts [to find their &#8216;last article accessed&#8217;] and have \u201cother sources\u201d they may use.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Wide-spectrum serendipitous &#8216;topic search&#8217;, of the sort enabled by JURN, is also strongly favoured in the Humanities&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2016\/03\/lastart.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-16852\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/2016\/03\/lastart.jpg\" alt=\"lastart\" width=\"529\" height=\"314\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-16852\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>And the researchers found that&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;Librarians behave quite differently to everyone else in search, preferring professional search databases and library-acquired resources.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A major new consultancy report, &#8220;How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications&#8221; (March 2016)&#8230;. * &#8220;&#8230; people working in the &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2016\/03\/24\/how-readers-discover-content-in-scholarly-publications\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,13,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academic-search","category-official-and-think-tank-reports","category-spotted-in-the-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16851"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16851\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}