{"id":11424,"date":"2014-09-05T10:47:26","date_gmt":"2014-09-05T09:47:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jurnsearch.wordpress.com\/?p=11424"},"modified":"2014-09-05T10:47:26","modified_gmt":"2014-09-05T09:47:26","slug":"conservation-science-not-available-to-conservationists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2014\/09\/05\/conservation-science-not-available-to-conservationists\/","title":{"rendered":"Conservation science not available to conservationists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/conservationmagazine.org\/2014\/09\/most-conservation-science-not-available-to-conservationists\/\">&#8220;Most conservation science not available to conservationists&#8221;<\/a> is a new  <em>Conservation<\/em> blogazine article.  It riffs on the recent academic paper <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/cobi.12346\/full\">&#8220;Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science&#8221;<\/a> which examined how much&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>scientific research published since the year 2000 in 20 conservation science journals is [now] publicly available<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They asked how many of those papers had made their way into open repositories.  Only 8.68%, it appears.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Most conservation science not available to conservationists&#8221; is a new Conservation blogazine article. It riffs on the recent academic paper &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/2014\/09\/05\/conservation-science-not-available-to-conservationists\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-spotted-in-the-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurn.link\/jurnsearch\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}